Comparison Overview

Prestel Publishing

VS

PLOS Climate

Prestel Publishing

Neumarkter Straße 28, Munich, 81673, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://prestelpublishing.penguinrandomhouse.de/

With its impressive list of titles in English and German, Prestel Publishing is one of the world's leading publishers in the fields of art, architecture, photography, design, cultural history, and ethnography. The company, founded in 1924, has its headquarters in Munich, offices in London, and an international sales network. Prestel is one of the world's leading illustrated book publishers with a stunning list of beautifully crafted books on all aspects of art, architecture, photography and design. From the latest street art and fashion to major exhibition catalogues, Prestel ensures that quality reigns throughout everything they publish. Prestel is the publisher for art lovers, designers and those with an eye for beauty - young and old alike, Prestel appeals to all those with a passion for visual culture. Since the very beginning, Prestel has emphasized quality. This has won the company wide recognition and numerous awards in the publishing world.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PLOS Climate

San Francisco, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.plosclimate.org

PLOS Climate is an open-access journal that furthers understanding of climatic patterns, processes, impacts and solutions by publishing transparent, rigorous and open research from diverse perspectives. PLOS Climate provides a venue for all areas of climate research, with an emphasis on collaborative, interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary work that improves global and regional understanding of climate phenomena and informs critical strategies for combating climate change. For Mastodon & Twitter: https://linktr.ee/plosclimate

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestel-publishing.jpeg
Prestel Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plosclimate.jpeg
PLOS Climate
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prestel Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PLOS Climate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prestel Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PLOS Climate in 2025.

Incident History — Prestel Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prestel Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PLOS Climate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PLOS Climate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestel-publishing.jpeg
Prestel Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plosclimate.jpeg
PLOS Climate
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Prestel Publishing company and PLOS Climate company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, PLOS Climate company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Prestel Publishing company.

In the current year, PLOS Climate company and Prestel Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PLOS Climate company nor Prestel Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PLOS Climate company nor Prestel Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PLOS Climate company nor Prestel Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prestel Publishing company nor PLOS Climate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PLOS Climate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prestel Publishing company.

Prestel Publishing company employs more people globally than PLOS Climate company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prestel Publishing nor PLOS Climate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References