Comparison Overview

Pollard

VS

zoomlock

Pollard

189 Avenue de Copenhague, Signes, 83870, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Concepteur et fabricant de pompes volumétriques depuis 1946. En plus de soixante-dix ans, Pollard a atteint son haut niveau d’expertise en développant des produits toujours plus fiables, performants et innovants. La société Pollard a depuis toujours mis l’accent sur la réactivité de son service commercial et sur la capacité de son bureau d’études à adapter techniquement sa technologie exclusive CMtec à l’ensemble des spécifications clients. C’est cet engagement permanent qui offre aujourd’hui à Pollard la réputation à travers le monde d’être un partenaire de 1er choix pour les industriels les plus exigeants. À la pointe de la technologie, son usine fortement automatisée est capable de réaliser sur demande des produits de grande qualité quel que soit le volume de production, permettant ainsi à ses clients d’atteindre leurs objectifs de réactivité, compétitivité et de fiabilité.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

zoomlock

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Think differently about refrigerant fittings! HVAC/R pros know that time is money. ZoomLock flame-free refrigerant fittings eliminate the brazing, flames, fire spotters, or risks associated with using traditional HVACR fittings. The ZoomLock system offers a 40% to 60% reduction in labor costs, boosting efficiency while providing the safety and reliability you expect from Parker. Learn how ZoomLock refrigeration press fittings can help you win more business.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollard-pompes.jpeg
Pollard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
zoomlock
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pollard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
zoomlock
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pollard in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for zoomlock in 2025.

Incident History — Pollard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pollard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — zoomlock (X = Date, Y = Severity)

zoomlock cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollard-pompes.jpeg
Pollard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
zoomlock
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, malware deployment
Motivation: financial gain, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

zoomlock company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pollard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

zoomlock company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Pollard company has not reported any.

In the current year, zoomlock company has reported more cyber incidents than Pollard company.

zoomlock company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Pollard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

zoomlock company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Pollard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither zoomlock company nor Pollard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pollard company nor zoomlock company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

zoomlock company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pollard company.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pollard nor zoomlock holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.