Comparison Overview

Pollard

VS

Laser Works

Pollard

189 Avenue de Copenhague, Signes, 83870, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Concepteur et fabricant de pompes volumétriques depuis 1946. En plus de soixante-dix ans, Pollard a atteint son haut niveau d’expertise en développant des produits toujours plus fiables, performants et innovants. La société Pollard a depuis toujours mis l’accent sur la réactivité de son service commercial et sur la capacité de son bureau d’études à adapter techniquement sa technologie exclusive CMtec à l’ensemble des spécifications clients. C’est cet engagement permanent qui offre aujourd’hui à Pollard la réputation à travers le monde d’être un partenaire de 1er choix pour les industriels les plus exigeants. À la pointe de la technologie, son usine fortement automatisée est capable de réaliser sur demande des produits de grande qualité quel que soit le volume de production, permettant ainsi à ses clients d’atteindre leurs objectifs de réactivité, compétitivité et de fiabilité.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laser Works

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Subcontracting in LasercuttingLaser Works is reeds meer dan 15 jaar actief als toeleverancier in lasersnijden van buis en plaat. Dankzij vakbekwame mensen en ons hoogtechnologisch machinepark wisten wij een sterke reputatie op te bouwen. Zo kunnen we producten tot 4m lang snijden en numerisch gestuurd plooien. Innovatieve software helpt ons om knooppunten van ronde en rechthoekige buizen, in combinatie met vlakke stukken, kostenbesparend uit te werken. Een ruim assortiment plaatmateriaal en buizen op voorraad, gekoppeld aan een flexibele productie en service maken ons tot uw betrouwbare partner. Tot onze klanten rekenen wij onder andere de automobielsector, machinebouw, design, kunst, lettering, trappenmakers, en andere.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollard-pompes.jpeg
Pollard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pollard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laser Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pollard in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Works in 2025.

Incident History — Pollard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pollard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laser Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pollard-pompes.jpeg
Pollard
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laser Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pollard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laser Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pollard company.

In the current year, Laser Works company and Pollard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laser Works company nor Pollard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laser Works company nor Pollard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laser Works company nor Pollard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pollard company nor Laser Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pollard company nor Laser Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pollard company employs more people globally than Laser Works company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pollard nor Laser Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.