Comparison Overview

Palace Casino Resort

VS

L'Auberge Baton Rouge

Palace Casino Resort

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Palace Casino Resort is the only smoke free casino on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and the premiere destination for luxurious accommodations, superior guest service and endless excitement. Nestled along the beautiful Gulf of Mexico and Biloxi’s Back Bay, the resort offers hotel rooms and suites with stunning views, award winning restaurants, non-stop gaming, championship golf at The Preserve Golf Club and amazing amenities to complement your stay.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

L'Auberge Baton Rouge

777 L’Auberge Avenue, Baton Rouge, LA, 70820, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

L’Auberge Casino & Hotel Baton Rouge is a $368-million premier southern facility located on 575 acres of land in Baton Rouge, La., off Nicholson Drive in East Baton Rouge Parish. L’Auberge captures the feel of a Southern river lodge and embraces Louisiana's rich cultural history, food, music and ‘laissez les bon temps rouler’ way of life. L’Auberge includes an expansive single-level, 74,000 square foot casino; nearly 1,500 slot machines; 50 table games, including a poker room; a 12-story hotel with 205 guest rooms, unique rooftop pool and state-of the-art fitness center overlooking the Mississippi River; four dining outlets; a unique casino nightclub with breathtaking views of the river; and 2,400 total parking spaces, including 800 in a covered parking garage.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 323
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l'auberge-baton-rouge.jpeg
L'Auberge Baton Rouge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Palace Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L'Auberge Baton Rouge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palace Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L'Auberge Baton Rouge in 2025.

Incident History — Palace Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palace Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L'Auberge Baton Rouge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L'Auberge Baton Rouge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palace-casino-resort.jpeg
Palace Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l'auberge-baton-rouge.jpeg
L'Auberge Baton Rouge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Palace Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to L'Auberge Baton Rouge company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L'Auberge Baton Rouge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Palace Casino Resort company.

In the current year, L'Auberge Baton Rouge company and Palace Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L'Auberge Baton Rouge company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L'Auberge Baton Rouge company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L'Auberge Baton Rouge company nor Palace Casino Resort company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort company nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

L'Auberge Baton Rouge company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Palace Casino Resort company.

L'Auberge Baton Rouge company employs more people globally than Palace Casino Resort company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Palace Casino Resort nor L'Auberge Baton Rouge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.