Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OTP Bank MagyarországOTP Bank Magyarország
VS
Caisse d’EpargneCaisse d’Epargne
OTP Bank Magyarország

OTP Bank Magyarország

HU

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.otpbank.hu
802/1000Good

Az OTP Csoport Magyarország egyik legnagyobb pénzügyi szolgáltató vállalata. A nemzetközi terjeszkedés eredményeként az OTP Csoport ma már meghatározó regionális szereplő a kelet-közép-európai piacon, Magyarországon kívül további 10 országban van jelen. Az OTP Csoport ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:4,828
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Caisse d’Epargne

Caisse d’Epargne

50 avenue Pierre Mendes France, Paris, 75012, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.caisse-epargne.fr
762/1000Fair

Banques coopératives, les Caisses d'Epargne conjuguent depuis 1818 confiance, solidarité et modernité. Deuxième réseau bancaire en France, les 16 Caisses d'Epargne régionales comptent parmi les premières banques de leur région. Elles accompagnent tous les acteurs écon...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:21,030
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OTP Bank Magyarország

OTP Bank Magyarország

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Caisse d’Epargne

Caisse d’Epargne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OTP Bank Magyarország in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caisse d’Epargne in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OTP Bank Magyarország (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OTP Bank Magyarország cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Caisse d’Epargne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caisse d’Epargne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OTP Bank Magyarország

OTP Bank Magyarország

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Caisse d’Epargne

Caisse d’Epargne

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LA-CAICRE1766406599

FAQ

Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország company and Caisse d’Epargne company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország and Caisse d’Epargne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország and Caisse d’Epargne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OTP Bank Magyarország or Caisse d’Epargne ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OTP Bank Magyarország or Caisse d’Epargne ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország and Caisse d’Epargne, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OTP Bank Magyarország and Caisse d’Epargne, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44541
SUMMARY

Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49141
SUMMARY

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47345
SUMMARY

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47344
SUMMARY

When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-46484
SUMMARY

Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8