Comparison Overview

Orban Ranch

VS

A Signs

Orban Ranch

5726 SW Corbett Ave., Portland, OR, US, 97239
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Orban Ranch: Where Great Ideas Roam Free. A graphic design firm in Portland, Oregon specializing in packaging and logo design. How do you really know what makes your brand unique? Well for starters, we take a long and deliberate look at your competitors, customers and markets. Because design that's based on research is proven to be more effective at increasing sales. We have an experienced network of specialists, and our team can be scaled to meet any size project. Copywriters, photographers, web programmers, booth manufacturers—you name it. You’ll quickly see that we are the real deal when it comes to creating effective communications.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A Signs

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

A-Signs has been established since 2002, originally supplying fire and safety signage. We have brought forward our portfolio to include vehicle graphics, digital displays and banners, shop fascias and much more. We design, manufacture and install signs to your own specifications, schedules and budget, no matter what size your business. With investment in the latest equipment, A-Signs are able to deliver quality and quantity without compromise. Whether its a small house sign or a neon sign, be sure to call in and see us at our showroom for a no obligation quote.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orban-ranch.jpeg
Orban Ranch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-signs.jpeg
A Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Orban Ranch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orban Ranch in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Signs in 2025.

Incident History — Orban Ranch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orban Ranch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orban-ranch.jpeg
Orban Ranch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-signs.jpeg
A Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Orban Ranch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Orban Ranch company.

In the current year, A Signs company and Orban Ranch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A Signs company nor Orban Ranch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A Signs company nor Orban Ranch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A Signs company nor Orban Ranch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Orban Ranch company nor A Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Orban Ranch company nor A Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A Signs company employs more people globally than Orban Ranch company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Orban Ranch nor A Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X