Comparison Overview

Omaha Children's Museum

VS

Glenview History Center

Omaha Children's Museum

500 S 20th St, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Omaha Children's Museum is in the top 15% of children's museums nationally. The museum features over 45,000 square feet of exhibit space, with permanent exhibits including: Charlie Campbell Science & Technology Center Art Smart Center Tinker Factory Imagination Playground (early childhood area) Fantastic Future Me Walker Tire & Auto Service Center Grass Patch Sandy's Splish Splash Garden In addition to its permanent exhibits, Omaha Children's Museum offers educational programs, traveling exhibitions, field trips, outreach programs, rentals, summer camps and birthday parties.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glenview History Center

1121 Waukegan Road, Glenview, IL, US, 60025
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Glenview History Center is a nonprofit organization founded in 1965. The Center aims to preserve, nurture, and promote an awareness and appreciation of the Village of Glenview's local history by conducting educational programs and providing informational services to the community. To this end, Glenview History Center maintains a farmhouse museum and library, which are open to the public weekly.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-children's-museum.jpeg
Omaha Children's Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenview-history-center.jpeg
Glenview History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omaha Children's Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glenview History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omaha Children's Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glenview History Center in 2025.

Incident History — Omaha Children's Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omaha Children's Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glenview History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glenview History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omaha-children's-museum.jpeg
Omaha Children's Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenview-history-center.jpeg
Glenview History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glenview History Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omaha Children's Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glenview History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Omaha Children's Museum company.

In the current year, Glenview History Center company and Omaha Children's Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glenview History Center company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glenview History Center company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glenview History Center company nor Omaha Children's Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum company nor Glenview History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum company nor Glenview History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omaha Children's Museum company employs more people globally than Glenview History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omaha Children's Museum nor Glenview History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X