Comparison Overview

City of Oakland

VS

Malmö stad

City of Oakland

1 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, None, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://oaklandca.gov

Incorporated in 1852, Oakland is the eighth largest city in California, with an estimated population of 450,000 and a wealth of resources and opportunities. Located on the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Oakland is bordered by 19 miles of coastline to the west and rolling hills to the east, which provide unparalleled vistas of the Bay and the Pacific Ocean.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,484
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, undefined, 205 80, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lika värde är en förutsättning för demokrati och är också en självklarhet i vår värdegrund. Med 20 000 medarbetare är Malmö stad en av de största arbetsgivarna i Skåne. Vi har över 400 yrkeskategorier representerade inom 22 förvaltningar. Är du intresserad av att jobba hos oss? Se våra lediga tjänster på http://www.malmo.se/jobb

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,521
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Oakland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Malmö stad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Oakland has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2025.

Incident History — City of Oakland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Oakland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: stolen credentials, exploitation of known vulnerabilities (FortiOS, Microsoft Exchange, CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp), external-facing services (RDP, VPNs), phishing (implied via credential theft)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/malmo-stad.jpeg
Malmö stad
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Malmö stad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Oakland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Oakland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Malmö stad company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Oakland company has reported more cyber incidents than Malmö stad company.

City of Oakland company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Malmö stad company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Malmö stad company nor City of Oakland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Oakland company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Malmö stad company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Oakland company nor Malmö stad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Malmö stad company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Oakland company.

Malmö stad company employs more people globally than City of Oakland company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Malmö stad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References