Comparison Overview

City of Oakland

VS

FEMA

City of Oakland

1 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, None, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://oaklandca.gov

Incorporated in 1852, Oakland is the eighth largest city in California, with an estimated population of 450,000 and a wealth of resources and opportunities. Located on the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Oakland is bordered by 19 miles of coastline to the west and rolling hills to the east, which provide unparalleled vistas of the Bay and the Pacific Ocean.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,484
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

FEMA

500 C Street SW, None, Washington, DC, US, 20472
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 550 and 599
http://www.fema.gov

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). When disaster strikes, America looks to FEMA to support survivors and first responders in communities all across the country. This page provides career related information, job announcements and relevant updates for the agency’s current and future workforce. FEMA fosters innovation, rewards performance and creativity, and provides challenges on a routine basis with a well-skilled, knowledgeable, and high performance workforce. Join our mission to support Americans when they need you most!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,641
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Oakland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FEMA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Oakland has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

FEMA has 361.54% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — City of Oakland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Oakland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FEMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FEMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: stolen credentials, exploitation of known vulnerabilities (FortiOS, Microsoft Exchange, CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp), external-facing services (RDP, VPNs), phishing (implied via credential theft)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials, Exploitation of Citrix Remote Desktop Software, Lateral Movement via VPN Software
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FEMA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Oakland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FEMA company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to City of Oakland company.

In the current year, FEMA company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Oakland company.

Both FEMA company and City of Oakland company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

FEMA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Oakland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both FEMA company and City of Oakland company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

FEMA company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while City of Oakland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FEMA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Oakland company.

FEMA company employs more people globally than City of Oakland company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor FEMA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References