Comparison Overview

City of Oakland

VS

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

City of Oakland

1 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, None, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 0 and 549

Incorporated in 1852, Oakland is the eighth largest city in California, with an estimated population of 450,000 and a wealth of resources and opportunities. Located on the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Oakland is bordered by 19 miles of coastline to the west and rolling hills to the east, which provide unparalleled vistas of the Bay and the Pacific Ocean.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,484
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

24 Beacon Street, None, Boston, MA, US, 02133
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Year after year, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has continued to pioneer bold legislative actions and programs, some of which have been embraced on a national scale. We are always looking for talented individuals to help us maintain this momentum and improve the services that millions of people depend on every day. If you’re looking for an innovative work environment where you can really make a difference, check out the job opportunities with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This page is managed according to the Mass.gov social media policy: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgov-social-media-policy. Comments that do not follow our policy may be removed.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,463
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Oakland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Oakland has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2025.

Incident History — City of Oakland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Oakland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Commonwealth of Massachusetts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth of Massachusetts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: stolen credentials, exploitation of known vulnerabilities (FortiOS, Microsoft Exchange, CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp), external-facing services (RDP, VPNs), phishing (implied via credential theft)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Oakland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Oakland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Oakland company has reported more cyber incidents than Commonwealth of Massachusetts company.

City of Oakland company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor City of Oakland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Oakland company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Oakland company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Oakland company.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company employs more people globally than City of Oakland company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L