Comparison Overview

City of Oakland

VS

City of Los Angeles

City of Oakland

1 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, None, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 0 and 549

Incorporated in 1852, Oakland is the eighth largest city in California, with an estimated population of 450,000 and a wealth of resources and opportunities. Located on the east side of the San Francisco Bay, Oakland is bordered by 19 miles of coastline to the west and rolling hills to the east, which provide unparalleled vistas of the Bay and the Pacific Ocean.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,484
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

City of Los Angeles

200 North Spring St., Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The City of Los Angeles employs more than 45,000 people in a wide range of careers. Visit our website for information on current openings, including regular civil service positions, exempt and emergency appointment opportunities, in addition to internships! The City of Los Angeles is a Mayor-Council-Commission form of government, as originally adopted by voters of the City of Los Angeles, effective July 1, 1925, and reaffirmed by a new Charter effective July 1, 2000. A Mayor, City Controller, and City Attorney are elected by City residents every four years. Fifteen City Council members representing fifteen districts are elected by the people for four-year terms, for a maximum of two terms. Members of Commissions are generally appointed by the Mayor, subject to the approval of the City Council. General Managers of the various City departments are also appointed by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Most employees of the City are subject to the civil service provisions of the City Charter.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 15,569
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Oakland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Los Angeles
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Oakland has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Los Angeles in 2025.

Incident History — City of Oakland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Oakland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oakland.jpeg
City of Oakland
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: stolen credentials, exploitation of known vulnerabilities (FortiOS, Microsoft Exchange, CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp), external-facing services (RDP, VPNs), phishing (implied via credential theft)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-los-angeles.jpeg
City of Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Los Angeles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Oakland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Oakland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas City of Los Angeles company has not reported any.

In the current year, City of Oakland company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Los Angeles company.

City of Oakland company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Los Angeles company nor City of Oakland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Oakland company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Los Angeles company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Oakland company nor City of Los Angeles company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

City of Los Angeles company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Oakland company.

City of Los Angeles company employs more people globally than City of Oakland company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Oakland nor City of Los Angeles holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L