Comparison Overview

New York Blood Center

VS

OhioHealth

New York Blood Center

310 East 67th Street, New York, NY, US, 10065
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Founded in 1964, New York Blood Center (NYBC) is a nonprofit organization that is one of the largest independent, community-based blood centers in the world. NYBC, along with its partner organizations Community Blood Center of Kansas City, Missouri (CBC), Innovative Blood Resources (IBR), Blood Bank of Delmarva (BBD), and Rhode Island Blood Center (RIBC), collect approximately 4,000 units of blood products each day and serve local communities of more than 45 million people in the Tri-State area (NY, NJ, CT), Mid Atlantic area (PA, DE, MD), the Kansas City metropolitan area, Minnesota, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and Southern New England. NYBC and its partners also provide a wide array of transfusion-related medical services, including Comprehensive Cell Solutions, the National Center for Blood Group Genomics, the National Cord Blood Program, and the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, which — among other milestones — developed the Hepatitis B vaccine and a patented solvent detergent plasma process innovating blood-purification technology worldwide.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,051
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

OhioHealth

3430 OhioHealth Parkway, Columbus, Ohio, US, 43202
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

OhioHealth is a nationally recognized, not-for-profit, faith-based health system of more than 35,000 associates, providers and volunteers. We lead with our mission to improve the health of those we serve throughout our 16 hospitals and 200+ urgent, primary and specialty care sites spanning 50 Ohio counties. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, we’re proud to be consistently recognized by FORTUNE as one of the “100 Best Companies to Work For” and rated a Top Hospital & Health System by Fair360 in 2024.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,532
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-blood-center.jpeg
New York Blood Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New York Blood Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OhioHealth
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

New York Blood Center has 294.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OhioHealth in 2025.

Incident History — New York Blood Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York Blood Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OhioHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OhioHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-blood-center.jpeg
New York Blood Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohiohealth.jpeg
OhioHealth
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OhioHealth company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New York Blood Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

New York Blood Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas OhioHealth company has not reported any.

In the current year, New York Blood Center company has reported more cyber incidents than OhioHealth company.

New York Blood Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OhioHealth company has not reported such incidents publicly.

New York Blood Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other OhioHealth company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OhioHealth company nor New York Blood Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New York Blood Center company nor OhioHealth company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New York Blood Center company nor OhioHealth company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OhioHealth company employs more people globally than New York Blood Center company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New York Blood Center nor OhioHealth holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X