Comparison Overview

Neteon

VS

Viptela

Neteon

1 Tower Center Blvd, East Brunswick, New Jersey, 08816, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Neteon is your trusted partner for industrial network devices in new Energy-related projects. Our robust solutions empower critical infrastructure, renewable energy, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) through cutting-edge industrial IoT hardware. We provide secure and reliable network solutions that enable devices to connect, communicate, and collaborate with systems, processes, and people. Since 2002, we have connected over 1 million devices and served 26,000 customers around the globe. Our engineers undergo continuous training and certification from our suppliers, ensuring we remain at the forefront of IIoT technology trends. With our agile, organic structure, we tailor solutions to meet your project’s unique requirements. Whether building a network from scratch or upgrading existing infrastructure, our expert team is here to support you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Viptela

1730 N 1st St., Suite 500, San Jose, CA, 95110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Viptela is a fast growing, private company that is disrupting network infrastructure technology that enterprises use to connect their facilities, users and applications. Featured in the Forbes, Wall Street Journal and leading trade-press journals, Viptela has emerged as a clear leader in the multi-billion Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN) segment. Over 25 Fortune-500 companies deploy Viptela technology at thousands of sites on six continents, to drastically simplify their WAN infrastructure with over 50% cost-savings. Verizon and Singtel offer managed services, globally, based on Viptela's SD-WAN technology. Viptela’s secure, overlay WAN technology delivers to enterprises the benefit of: • Unified and centralized management of all WAN infrastructure • Reduced WAN infrastructure costs by over 50% • In-depth control & visibility of application performance • Robust-zero trust WAN security • Agility, by reducing network change control from months to days Viptela is backed by Sequoia Capital. A 3-minute video overview is here http://youtu.be/0iW-3tt4LH4

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neteon-technologies.jpeg
Neteon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viptela.jpeg
Viptela
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neteon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Viptela
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neteon in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Viptela in 2025.

Incident History — Neteon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neteon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Viptela (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Viptela cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neteon-technologies.jpeg
Neteon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viptela.jpeg
Viptela
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neteon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Viptela company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Viptela company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neteon company.

In the current year, Viptela company and Neteon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Viptela company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Viptela company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Viptela company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neteon company nor Viptela company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neteon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Viptela company.

Viptela company employs more people globally than Neteon company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neteon nor Viptela holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.