Comparison Overview

Neteon

VS

MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications)

Neteon

1 Tower Center Blvd, East Brunswick, New Jersey, 08816, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neteon.net

Neteon is your trusted partner for industrial network devices in new Energy-related projects. Our robust solutions empower critical infrastructure, renewable energy, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) through cutting-edge industrial IoT hardware. We provide secure and reliable network solutions that enable devices to connect, communicate, and collaborate with systems, processes, and people. Since 2002, we have connected over 1 million devices and served 26,000 customers around the globe. Our engineers undergo continuous training and certification from our suppliers, ensuring we remain at the forefront of IIoT technology trends. With our agile, organic structure, we tailor solutions to meet your project’s unique requirements. Whether building a network from scratch or upgrading existing infrastructure, our expert team is here to support you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications)

1450 Oakbrook Dr, Norcross, GA, 30093, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://mgt.us

MGT is a national technology and advisory solutions leader serving state, local government, education (SLED) and targeted commercial clients. Our specialized solutions solve the most critical issues that live at the top of our clients’ leadership agenda. We partner to help clients build resilience, implement systematic change and strengthen their foundations, now and for the future. MGT is committed to impacting communities for good. Layer 3 Communications, now MGT, is an engineering firm that specializes in providing complex network services and products. Along with its hosted solutions, the company provides its customers design, management, optimization and ongoing support of network infrastructure and security (including real-time monitoring and zero-day threat mitigation). Our philosophical approach involves using capital (people, processes and technology) to solve problems.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neteon-technologies.jpeg
Neteon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/layer-3-communications.jpeg
MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Neteon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neteon in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) in 2025.

Incident History — Neteon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neteon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neteon-technologies.jpeg
Neteon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/layer-3-communications.jpeg
MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neteon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Neteon company.

In the current year, MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company and Neteon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company nor Neteon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Neteon company nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neteon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company.

MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) company employs more people globally than Neteon company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Neteon nor MGT (formerly Layer 3 Communications) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References