Comparison Overview

National Library of Medicine (NLM)

VS

Newark Public Library

National Library of Medicine (NLM)

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) is a leader in biomedical informatics and computational health data science research, and the world’s largest biomedical library. We lead innovation in the development of advanced tools for clinical data interpretation and decision-making through our cutting-edge research, training programs, and information services. We are distinctive within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) because of our substantial investment in sustainable biomedical information systems that make scientific literature, genomic, clinical, and other types of biomedical data readily available to those who need it. NLM plays a vital role in biomedical discovery and the translation of biomedical research into practice. We build and employ powerful, sophisticated tools to collect, organize, search, and disseminate data that enable innovation to power new kinds of discovery. We are a library for the world, and our work forms the backbone of scientific communication. We make information and knowledge flow—ensuring that scientists, policymakers, clinicians, patients, and the public have access to biomedical information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 764
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newark Public Library

US, 14513
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Newark Public Library is a public library in the Finger Lakes region of New York. This library is affiliated with the library system that serves Newark, NY and it is a member of the Pioneer Library System. The collection of the library contains 43288 volumes and the library circulates 118892 items per year. This library serves a population of nearly 10,000 residents.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-library-of-medicine-nlm.jpeg
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newark-public-library.jpeg
Newark Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newark Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Library of Medicine (NLM) in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newark Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — National Library of Medicine (NLM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Library of Medicine (NLM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newark Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newark Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-library-of-medicine-nlm.jpeg
National Library of Medicine (NLM)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newark-public-library.jpeg
Newark Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Library of Medicine (NLM) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newark Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newark Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Library of Medicine (NLM) company.

In the current year, Newark Public Library company and National Library of Medicine (NLM) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newark Public Library company nor National Library of Medicine (NLM) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newark Public Library company nor National Library of Medicine (NLM) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newark Public Library company nor National Library of Medicine (NLM) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) company nor Newark Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Library of Medicine (NLM) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Newark Public Library company.

National Library of Medicine (NLM) company employs more people globally than Newark Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Library of Medicine (NLM) nor Newark Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.