Comparison Overview

NAKIVO

VS

Grab

NAKIVO

4894 Sparks Blvd. , Sparks, NV, 89436-8202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nakivo.com

NAKIVO is a US-based corporation dedicated to delivering the ultimate backup, ransomware protection and disaster recovery solution for virtual, physical, cloud and SaaS environments. As one of the fastest-growing backup and ransomware recovery software vendors in the industry, NAKIVO boasts 24 consecutive quarters of double-digit growth, 5-star online community reviews, 98% customer satisfaction with support and a network of over 8000 partners worldwide. Over 30,000 active customers in 183 countries trust NAKIVO with protecting their data, including major companies like Honda, Cisco, Coca-Cola and Siemens.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Grab

3 Media Close, Grab HQ #01-03/06 , Singapore, Singapore, SG, 138498
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849
https://grab.careers

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for everyone. At Grab, every Grabber is guided by The Grab Way, which explains our mission and the operating principles on how we can achieve it together. We call these principles the 4Hs: Heart We work together as OneGrab to serve communities in Southeast Asia Hunger We work to understand ground truths and drive improvements, big and small Honour We keep our word and steward our resources wisely to build and sustain trust Humility We are a constant work-in-progress, and we never stop learning to get better

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 52,680
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nakivo.jpeg
NAKIVO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAKIVO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAKIVO in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2025.

Incident History — NAKIVO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAKIVO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nakivo.jpeg
NAKIVO
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Reads
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Arbitrary File Reads
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Potential Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAKIVO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NAKIVO company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grab company has not reported any.

In the current year, Grab company and NAKIVO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grab company nor NAKIVO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grab company nor NAKIVO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grab company nor NAKIVO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

NAKIVO company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Grab company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Grab company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NAKIVO company.

Grab company employs more people globally than NAKIVO company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAKIVO nor Grab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server, Remote Desktop Manager on Windows.This issue affects Devolutions Server: through 2025.3.8.0; Remote Desktop Manager: through 2025.3.23.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Out-of-bounds memory operations in org.lz4:lz4-java 1.8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause denial of service and read adjacent memory via untrusted compressed input.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Reveals plaintext credentials in the MONITOR command vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from 1.0.0 through 2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache Kvrocks. This issue affects Apache Kvrocks: from v2.9.0 through v2.13.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.14.0, which fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

File upload vulnerability in HCL Technologies Ltd. Unica 12.0.0.

Published
Date
2025-11-28
Updated
Date
2025-11-28
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References