Comparison Overview

Money-Media

VS

Routledge

Money-Media

330 Hudson Street, New York, NY, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Money-Media is focused on being the premier source of news and intelligence for the global investment management industry and U.S. corporate board directors. Through our extensive suite of products, including Agenda, BoardIQ, Financial Advisor IQ, FundFire, Ignites, Ignites Europe, Ignites Asia, Ignites Research and MandateWire, we now support the business IQ of hundreds of thousands of readers across the world. In January 2008, Money-Media was purchased by the Financial Times (FT). The FT stated it “has strengthened its position in quality news and analysis for the global money management industry through the acquisition of Money-Media, the US-based market leader in online news and commentary for the sector.” Money-Media continues to strive to be entrepreneurial, innovative and passionate by launching new products and services year after year. Our mission is to deliver must-have content that helps people do their jobs better and sits at the heart of our customers’ success.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Routledge

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Taylor & Francis Group engages in publishing and distribution of scientific, academic, and professional journals and books. The company’s publications coveres a range of subjects including: bioscience, business and management, construction, education, engineering, the environment, humanities, medicine and healthcare, physical sciences, psychology, reference and social and political science. As of May 10, 2004, Taylor & Francis Group is a subsidiary of Informa Group plc.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 365
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/money-media.jpeg
Money-Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Routledge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Money-Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Routledge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Money-Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Routledge in 2025.

Incident History — Money-Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Money-Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Routledge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Routledge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/money-media.jpeg
Money-Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Routledge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Routledge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Money-Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Routledge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Money-Media company.

In the current year, Routledge company and Money-Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Routledge company nor Money-Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Routledge company nor Money-Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Routledge company nor Money-Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Money-Media company nor Routledge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Money-Media company nor Routledge company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Routledge company employs more people globally than Money-Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Money-Media nor Routledge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.