Comparison Overview

MiRO

VS

INTEXCO

MiRO

Nr 9 Landmarks Avenue , Pretoria, 0153, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a responsible supplier to the growing IP convergence industries, distributing and supporting technologies such as Wireless Broadband, Wi-Fi, Networking, Routing, VoIP, IoT, Fibre, Access Control and IP Video. We only supply best-of-breed products, deliver strong pre and after-sales technical support, internationally-certified trainings, as well as finance solutions to our customers. We serve and support business partners in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Angola, Mozambique, Lesotho, and Swaziland. Our brands include: Cambium Networks , Ubiquiti , Grandstream , BDCOM , MikroTik , Siklu , Tenda , Ring , TP-Link , Mimosa , Ignitenet , Acconet , Edge-coreE , Radwin , RF Elements and more.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INTEXCO

Ofc 6 queens court, Karachi, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to INTEXCO, where cutting-edge technology meets unwavering commitment to security and connectivity. At INTEXCO, we take pride in being at the forefront of the digital revolution, dedicated to providing innovative solutions that redefine the way individuals and organizations experience the interconnected world. At INTEXCO, we believe in more than just providing products; we strive to empower individuals and businesses to navigate the digital world with confidence. Our commitment to customer-centricity goes beyond the purchase; it's a promise to support and guide you throughout your journey with our products. Join us on this exciting journey as we pave the way for a safer, more connected tomorrow. Our Strategic Partners: HIKVISION EZVIZ Ruijie TENDA Panasonic Western Digital EMP

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miro-distribution.jpeg
MiRO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intexco.jpeg
INTEXCO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MiRO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INTEXCO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MiRO in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INTEXCO in 2025.

Incident History — MiRO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MiRO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INTEXCO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INTEXCO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miro-distribution.jpeg
MiRO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intexco.jpeg
INTEXCO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MiRO company and INTEXCO company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, INTEXCO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MiRO company.

In the current year, INTEXCO company and MiRO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INTEXCO company nor MiRO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INTEXCO company nor MiRO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INTEXCO company nor MiRO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MiRO company nor INTEXCO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MiRO company nor INTEXCO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MiRO company employs more people globally than INTEXCO company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MiRO nor INTEXCO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.