Comparison Overview
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
10 Shenton Way MAS Building, Singapore, 079117, SG
Last Update: 04/04/2026
MAS is at the forefront of Singapore’s rapidly growing financial industry, creating new policies and initiatives that address the ever-changing landscape. Work at MAS promises not only challenges worthy of your intellectual abilities, but also the personal satisfaction ...
alrajhi bank
King Fahad Branch Road, Al Rajhi Tower, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, SA, 11411
Last Update: 04/05/2026
Founded in 1957, Al Rajhi Bank is one of the largest Islamic banks in the world with total assets of SR 384 billion (US$ 102 billion), a paid up capital of SR 25 billion (US$ 6.66 billion) and an employee base of over 9,600 associates. With over 58 years of experience i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
alrajhi bank
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
alrajhi bank has 7.41% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - alrajhi bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
alrajhi bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
alrajhi bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.