Comparison Overview

Marathon Petroleum Corporation

VS

RussNeft

Marathon Petroleum Corporation

539 S. Main St, None, Findlay, Ohio, US, 45840
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is a leading, integrated, downstream and midstream energy company headquartered in Findlay, Ohio. The company operates the nation's largest refining system. MPC's marketing system includes branded locations across the United States, including Marathon brand retail outlets. MPC also owns the general partner and majority limited partner interest in MPLX LP, a midstream company that owns and operates gathering, processing, and fractionation assets, as well as crude oil and light product transportation and logistics infrastructure. More information is available at www.marathonpetroleum.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 16,023
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RussNeft

69, Pyatnitskaya st Moscow, RU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

ОАО Oil and Gas Company «RussNeft» came into existence in September 2002 . The structure of OAO NK “RussNeft” counts 24 upstream enterprises, 2 refineries, its own distribution net of gas filling stations. Geographic reach of “RussNeft” covers 12 regions of Russia and CIS: Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District, Tomsk, Ulianovsk, Penza, Briansk, Saratov, Kirov and Orenburg regions, the Republics of Udmurtia and Belarus. The head office of the Company is in Moscow. The Company is developing 167 oil and gas fields. The net effective pay of the company exceeds 600 million tons. The total amount of oil produced by the enterprises of the company is 13 million tons. In accordance with the approved long-term strategy of development “RussNeft is going within a 7-year period to build up the volume of production by more than one third. The total throughput of the refineries is 5.134 million tons. Since 2011 engine fuels of the Company meet ecological class Euro 3 quality standard.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-petroleum-company.jpeg
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russneft.jpeg
RussNeft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RussNeft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marathon Petroleum Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RussNeft in 2025.

Incident History — Marathon Petroleum Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marathon Petroleum Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RussNeft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RussNeft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-petroleum-company.jpeg
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russneft.jpeg
RussNeft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marathon Petroleum Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RussNeft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RussNeft company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation company.

In the current year, RussNeft company and Marathon Petroleum Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RussNeft company nor Marathon Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RussNeft company nor Marathon Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RussNeft company nor Marathon Petroleum Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation company nor RussNeft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation company nor RussNeft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marathon Petroleum Corporation company employs more people globally than RussNeft company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marathon Petroleum Corporation nor RussNeft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X