Comparison Overview

University of Texas

VS

IP Fabric

University of Texas

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

University of Texas Austin-The mission of The University of Texas at Austin is to achieve excellence in the interrelated areas of undergraduate education, graduate education, research and public service. The university provides superior and comprehensive educational opportunities at the baccalaureate through doctoral and special professional educational levels. The university contributes to the advancement of society through research, creative activity, scholarly inquiry and the development of new knowledge. The university preserves and promotes the arts, benefits the state’s economy, serves the citizens through public programs and provides other public service.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IP Fabric

98 N Washington St, Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

IP Fabric’s Automated Network Assurance Platform helps companies empower their network engineers to discover, verify, and document large scale enterprise networks within minutes. IP Fabric automates network infrastructure data collection and provides predefined verifications that highlight inconsistencies, misconfigurations and issues within enterprise networks. With experience and strength across Financial Services, Manufacturing, Logistics, Public Sector and more, we are ready to support businesses in addressing their key network management challenges with a new, analytically driven way of managing your network infrastructure. Using a unique network model and algorithms, the system reconstructs network state and simulates actual packet flows to detect critical violations, business-impacting inefficiencies, and verifies policy compliance. Based on graph theory of mathematics, native visualization of all network topologies and protocols provides unparalleled visibility, answering the question about how the network is running. Beautiful documentation and report outputs can be used directly as part of an existing process or managerial reporting requirements.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manor-isd.jpeg
University of Texas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IP Fabric
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Texas in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IP Fabric in 2025.

Incident History — University of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IP Fabric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IP Fabric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manor-isd.jpeg
University of Texas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Texas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IP Fabric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IP Fabric company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Texas company.

In the current year, IP Fabric company and University of Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IP Fabric company nor University of Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IP Fabric company nor University of Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IP Fabric company nor University of Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Texas company nor IP Fabric company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University of Texas company nor IP Fabric company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

University of Texas company employs more people globally than IP Fabric company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Texas nor IP Fabric holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.