Comparison Overview

Ltmnet

VS

Technolink

Ltmnet

4105, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-29
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltmnet.com

LtmNet are leaders in dynamic, user-centric web design. We build all our sites on our own framework which customizes and optimises each page for the individual user, regardless of the operating system or browser they use. This combined with our revolutionary 3-Point Preemptive Caching System results in faster pages, which display correctly in more browsers and on more operating systems than any other Web Development Model. Put simply, more people will see your site the way you want them to see it. Whether you're seeking a simple personal site, or a full e-commerce site to sell your wares from, LtmNet has the experience and know-how to deliver the site you need, at a price you can afford

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Technolink

Fuzuli str 49, Baku, AZ
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 800 and 849
http://www.technolink.az

Technolink is the IT company in Azerbaijan Market. Official distributor of Q-matic company. Helping to Financial, Heath. Retail and Government (Public) sector to solve the problem with big Q lines. Giving CFM solution which is useful for the future business and marketing activities with customer. With the services by Technolin and Q-Matic our customers can serve their customer at the high level and more professionally.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ltmnet.jpeg
Ltmnet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technolink.jpeg
Technolink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ltmnet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technolink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ltmnet in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technolink in 2025.

Incident History — Ltmnet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ltmnet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technolink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technolink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ltmnet.jpeg
Ltmnet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technolink.jpeg
Technolink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Technolink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ltmnet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technolink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ltmnet company.

In the current year, Technolink company and Ltmnet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technolink company nor Ltmnet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technolink company nor Ltmnet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technolink company nor Ltmnet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ltmnet company nor Technolink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ltmnet company nor Technolink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Technolink company employs more people globally than Ltmnet company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ltmnet nor Technolink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References