Comparison Overview

Little Rock Zoo

VS

Foss Waterway Seaport

Little Rock Zoo

1 Zoo Dr, Little Rock, 72205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Little Rock Zoo creates engaging experiences that inspire people to value and conserve our natural world. The Zoo is located in the heart of Little Rock in War Memorial Park and features 500 animals, many of which are endangered. It is accredited by the prestigious Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) and is the only zoological institution in the state to receive this designation. The Zoo provides the best in animal care and conservation and actively participates in conservation projects locally and abroad to save wild species. As part of this effort the Little Rock Zoo focuses on conservation learning to educate the public about the importance of saving wildlife and wild places. The Zoo is located on 33 acres but its education programs with animal ambassadors are seen throughout the state. The Zoo is committed to animals and to ensuring their long-term survival. We believe in a world where animals thrive and where all living things are respected.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foss Waterway Seaport

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98421, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Foss Waterway Seaport is dedicated to celebrating Tacoma's rich maritime heritage — past, present, and future. The development partners of this project — the Foss Waterway Seaport and the Foss Waterway Development Authority — are creating a venue bringing downtown Tacoma's gathering place to life and providing waterfront public access for the rich teaching platform provided by Commencement Bay and Puget Sound. When fully completed, the Seaport will be the most comprehensive maritime heritage and education center on the US west coast and the only authentic Pacific Northwest facility to showcase the region's maritime history in a location where that history actually took place!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/littlerockzoo.jpeg
Little Rock Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Little Rock Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foss Waterway Seaport
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Little Rock Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foss Waterway Seaport in 2025.

Incident History — Little Rock Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Little Rock Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foss Waterway Seaport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foss Waterway Seaport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/littlerockzoo.jpeg
Little Rock Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Little Rock Zoo company and Foss Waterway Seaport company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Foss Waterway Seaport company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Little Rock Zoo company.

In the current year, Foss Waterway Seaport company and Little Rock Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Little Rock Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Little Rock Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor Little Rock Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Little Rock Zoo company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Little Rock Zoo company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Little Rock Zoo company employs more people globally than Foss Waterway Seaport company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Little Rock Zoo nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X