Comparison Overview

Laser Works

VS

Burner Systems International

Laser Works

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tkchriston.be

Subcontracting in LasercuttingLaser Works is reeds meer dan 15 jaar actief als toeleverancier in lasersnijden van buis en plaat. Dankzij vakbekwame mensen en ons hoogtechnologisch machinepark wisten wij een sterke reputatie op te bouwen. Zo kunnen we producten tot 4m lang snijden en numerisch gestuurd plooien. Innovatieve software helpt ons om knooppunten van ronde en rechthoekige buizen, in combinatie met vlakke stukken, kostenbesparend uit te werken. Een ruim assortiment plaatmateriaal en buizen op voorraad, gekoppeld aan een flexibele productie en service maken ons tot uw betrouwbare partner. Tot onze klanten rekenen wij onder andere de automobielsector, machinebouw, design, kunst, lettering, trappenmakers, en andere.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Burner Systems International

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.robertshaw.com

Burner Systems International was acquired by Robertshaw in 2016 and is now part of Robertshaw. BSI designs, develops and manufactures components for gas appliance OEMs. This acquisition complements Robertshaw's market leading gas products business and creates the most comprehensive portfolio of gas delivery products and systems for the appliance and commercial original equipment manufacturers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burner-systems-international.jpeg
Burner Systems International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laser Works
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burner Systems International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Works in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burner Systems International in 2025.

Incident History — Laser Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burner Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burner Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burner-systems-international.jpeg
Burner Systems International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laser Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burner Systems International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burner Systems International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laser Works company.

In the current year, Burner Systems International company and Laser Works company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burner Systems International company nor Laser Works company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burner Systems International company nor Laser Works company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burner Systems International company nor Laser Works company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laser Works company nor Burner Systems International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burner Systems International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Laser Works company.

Burner Systems International company employs more people globally than Laser Works company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laser Works nor Burner Systems International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References