Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Landessparkasse zu OldenburgLandessparkasse zu Oldenburg
VS
UOBUOB
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Oldenburg (Oldenburg), DE

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lzo.com
755/1000Fair

Für die Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg (LzO) steht die Nähe zu unseren Kundinnen und Kunden an erster Stelle. Das beweisen wir nicht nur mit unseren 109 Filialen vor Ort, wir nehmen uns auch Zeit für Gespräche auf Augenhöhe. Als älteste durchgehend geschäftstätige Sparkas...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:334
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UOB

UOB

80 Raffles Place, Singapore, 048624, SG

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uobgroup.com/
797/1000Fair

We’re here to do Right By You. At UOB, we aspire to build a better future for the people and businesses in the region. Through our extensive network and suite of capabilities, we offer financial solutions to the people and businesses within, and connecting with ASE...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:28,537
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UOB

UOB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UOB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UOB

UOB

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UOB12542123

FAQ

Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg company and UOB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and UOB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and UOB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg or UOB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg or UOB ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and UOB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg and UOB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44541
SUMMARY

Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49141
SUMMARY

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47345
SUMMARY

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47344
SUMMARY

When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-46484
SUMMARY

Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8