Comparison Overview

Kids in the House

VS

Flying Solo

Kids in the House

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://kidsinthehouse.com

The Ultimate Parenting Resource. A website with video interviews featuring 450 parenting experts and over 7000 1-2 minute video answers to parents' most pressing questions. Topics range from fertility, pregnancy, the early years of parenting through the elementary and teen years. There is also a social media platform for parents to connect with other parents facing similar challenges.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Flying Solo

undefined, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749
http://www.flyingsolo.com.au

Home to a thriving community of over 100,000 solo and micro businesses, Flying Solo is a source of information, advice and inspiration for Australian business owners. http://www.flyingsolo.com.au/ Flying Solo hosts Australia’s most active online small business discussion forums; is involved in events and meet-ups around the country; works closely with Government and the private sector and frequently contributes opinion and commentary to the media. Meet the core team behind Flying Solo and get a feel for the philosophy that underpins the community here: http://www.flyingsolo.com.au/about

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kids in the House
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flying-solo.jpeg
Flying Solo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kids in the House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flying Solo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kids in the House in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flying Solo in 2025.

Incident History — Kids in the House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kids in the House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flying Solo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flying Solo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kids in the House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flying-solo.jpeg
Flying Solo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kids in the House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flying Solo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flying Solo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kids in the House company.

In the current year, Flying Solo company and Kids in the House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flying Solo company nor Kids in the House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flying Solo company nor Kids in the House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flying Solo company nor Kids in the House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kids in the House company nor Flying Solo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kids in the House company nor Flying Solo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kids in the House company employs more people globally than Flying Solo company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kids in the House nor Flying Solo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References