Comparison Overview

KENT

VS

Sika

KENT

Auf der Höhe 49, Duisburg, D-47059, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

With best chemical products we enable our customers to impress their customers. Our main goal is to secure the availability of mobility and create value for our customers by enabling them to generate new business or create exceptional experiences for their customers. Our customers appreciate our uncompromising quality, well-known reliability and innovative products which - deliver visible and measurable better work results - enable our customers to be more efficient and achieve substantial cost reduction - help to generate new business for our customers - enable our customers to create exceptional Customer Experience for their customers. Imprint: KENT Europe GmbH Auf der Höhe 49 | 47059 Duisburg Telefon: +49 203 60 717 - 0 E-Mail: [email protected] Geschäftsführer: Thorsten Vogt USt-ID: DE 313357017 Amtsgericht Duisburg HRB 29849 Data Policy: https://www.kenteurope.com/data-privacy/

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Sika

Zugerstrasse 50, Baar, Zug, 6341, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Sika is a specialty chemicals company with a globally leading position in the development and production of systems and products for bonding, sealing, damping, reinforcing, and protection in the building sector and industrial manufacturing. Sika has subsidiaries in 102 countries around the world and, in over 400 factories, produces innovative technologies for customers worldwide. In doing so, it plays a crucial role in enabling the transformation of the construction and transportation sector toward greater environmental compatibility. With more than 34,000 employees, the company generated sales of CHF 11.76 billion in 2024. On Sika's LinkedIn page we share our most important corporate news and job openings, as well as a broad mix of content from our Sika subsidiaries around the world. Your Career at Sika: https://www.sika.com/en/career.html

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 17,665
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kent-europe.jpeg
KENT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sika.jpeg
Sika
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KENT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sika
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KENT in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sika in 2025.

Incident History — KENT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KENT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kent-europe.jpeg
KENT
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Sharing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sika.jpeg
Sika
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sika company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KENT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KENT company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sika company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sika company and KENT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sika company nor KENT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KENT company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Sika company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sika company nor KENT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KENT company nor Sika company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sika company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KENT company.

Sika company employs more people globally than KENT company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KENT nor Sika holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.