Comparison Overview

KENT

VS

LyondellBasell

KENT

Auf der Höhe 49, Duisburg, D-47059, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

With best chemical products we enable our customers to impress their customers. Our main goal is to secure the availability of mobility and create value for our customers by enabling them to generate new business or create exceptional experiences for their customers. Our customers appreciate our uncompromising quality, well-known reliability and innovative products which - deliver visible and measurable better work results - enable our customers to be more efficient and achieve substantial cost reduction - help to generate new business for our customers - enable our customers to create exceptional Customer Experience for their customers. Imprint: KENT Europe GmbH Auf der Höhe 49 | 47059 Duisburg Telefon: +49 203 60 717 - 0 E-Mail: [email protected] Geschäftsführer: Thorsten Vogt USt-ID: DE 313357017 Amtsgericht Duisburg HRB 29849 Data Policy: https://www.kenteurope.com/data-privacy/

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell Tower, Ste. 700, 1221 McKinney Street, Houston, TX, US, 77010
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We are LyondellBasell (NYSE: LYB) – a leader in the global chemical industry creating solutions for everyday sustainable living. Through advanced technology and focused investments, we are enabling a circular and low carbon economy. Across all we do, we aim to unlock value for our customers, investors and society. As one of the world's largest producers of polymers and a leader in polyolefin technologies, we develop, manufacture and market high-quality and innovative products for applications ranging from sustainable transportation and food safety to clean water and quality healthcare. For more information, please visit www.lyondellbasell.com.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 13,394
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kent-europe.jpeg
KENT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyondell-basell.jpeg
LyondellBasell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KENT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LyondellBasell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KENT in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LyondellBasell in 2025.

Incident History — KENT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KENT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LyondellBasell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LyondellBasell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kent-europe.jpeg
KENT
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Sharing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyondell-basell.jpeg
LyondellBasell
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LyondellBasell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KENT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KENT company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LyondellBasell company has not reported any.

In the current year, LyondellBasell company and KENT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LyondellBasell company nor KENT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KENT company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other LyondellBasell company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LyondellBasell company nor KENT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KENT company nor LyondellBasell company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LyondellBasell company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KENT company.

LyondellBasell company employs more people globally than KENT company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KENT nor LyondellBasell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.