Comparison Overview

Ivanti

VS

Pitney Bowes

Ivanti

10377 South Jordan Gateway, Suite 110, South Jordan, UT, US, 84095
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.ivanti.com

Ivanti is a global enterprise IT and security software company dedicated to unlocking human potential by managing, automating and protecting data and systems to empower continuous innovation. With adaptable software solutions tailored to customer needs, Ivanti empowers IT and security teams to enhance operational efficiency, cut costs and proactively mitigate security risks. At the heart of Ivanti’s offerings is the AI-powered Ivanti Neurons platform, which transforms the way IT and security teams operate. By delivering unified, reusable services and tools, the platform ensures consistent visibility, scalability, and secure solution implementation, enabling teams to work smarter, not harder. Over 34,000 customers, including 85 of the Fortune 100, have chosen Ivanti to meet their challenges. Ivanti follows “Secure by Design” principles to provide software solutions that scale with our customers’ needs to help enable IT and Security to improve operational efficiency while reducing costs and proactively reducing risk. Ivanti fosters an inclusive environment where diverse perspectives are honored and valued, reflecting a commitment to a sustainable future for customers, partners, employees and the planet.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2,962
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Pitney Bowes

3001 Summer Street, None, Stamford, CT, US, 06926
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pitneybowes.com/us

Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven products and services company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bowes to reduce the complexity of sending mail and parcels. For additional information, visit Pitney Bowes at www.pitneybowes.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,875
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ivanti.jpeg
Ivanti
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ivanti
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pitney Bowes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Ivanti has 1945.45% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pitney Bowes in 2025.

Incident History — Ivanti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ivanti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ivanti.jpeg
Ivanti
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Exploitation (69% of CVEs), Remote Code Execution (30% of CVEs), Social Engineering (ClickFix/FileFix), BYOI (Bring-Your-Own-Installer), JIT Hooking, Memory Injection
Motivation: Geopolitical (state-sponsored: 53%), Financial gain (theft/fraud: 27%; ransomware: 20%)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities
Motivation: Espionage and Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local (Authenticated)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pitney Bowes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ivanti company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ivanti company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Pitney Bowes company.

In the current year, Ivanti company has reported more cyber incidents than Pitney Bowes company.

Both Pitney Bowes company and Ivanti company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Ivanti company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Pitney Bowes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pitney Bowes company nor Ivanti company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ivanti company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Pitney Bowes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ivanti company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pitney Bowes company.

Pitney Bowes company employs more people globally than Ivanti company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ivanti nor Pitney Bowes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References