Comparison Overview

IP Fabric

VS

Digiliant Storage Servers

IP Fabric

98 N Washington St, Boston, 02114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

IP Fabric’s Automated Network Assurance Platform helps companies empower their network engineers to discover, verify, and document large scale enterprise networks within minutes. IP Fabric automates network infrastructure data collection and provides predefined verifications that highlight inconsistencies, misconfigurations and issues within enterprise networks. With experience and strength across Financial Services, Manufacturing, Logistics, Public Sector and more, we are ready to support businesses in addressing their key network management challenges with a new, analytically driven way of managing your network infrastructure. Using a unique network model and algorithms, the system reconstructs network state and simulates actual packet flows to detect critical violations, business-impacting inefficiencies, and verifies policy compliance. Based on graph theory of mathematics, native visualization of all network topologies and protocols provides unparalleled visibility, answering the question about how the network is running. Beautiful documentation and report outputs can be used directly as part of an existing process or managerial reporting requirements.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Digiliant Storage Servers

5100 Marsh Rd, Okemos, 48864, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Custom Manufactured 12GB/s High Performance Enterprise Storage Server Solutions to meet your exact On-Premises Storage requirements and about the Cost Saving and Superior Windows/Linux Hardware Solution we can bring to your organization. Government, Educational, Corporate Discount available when Quoting out a system for you! Contact us for more details! www.digiliant.com

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Digiliant Storage Servers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IP Fabric
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Digiliant Storage Servers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IP Fabric in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digiliant Storage Servers in 2025.

Incident History — IP Fabric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IP Fabric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Digiliant Storage Servers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digiliant Storage Servers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ip-fabric.jpeg
IP Fabric
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Digiliant Storage Servers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Digiliant Storage Servers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IP Fabric company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Digiliant Storage Servers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IP Fabric company.

In the current year, Digiliant Storage Servers company and IP Fabric company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Digiliant Storage Servers company nor IP Fabric company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Digiliant Storage Servers company nor IP Fabric company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Digiliant Storage Servers company nor IP Fabric company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IP Fabric company nor Digiliant Storage Servers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Digiliant Storage Servers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IP Fabric company.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IP Fabric nor Digiliant Storage Servers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.