Comparison Overview

InPath Devices

VS

Business Alternatives, Inc

InPath Devices

3610 Dodge St, Ste 200, Omaha, NE, 68131, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

InPath Devices is a 3Com NBX Voice Authorized Gold Partner. An NBX Gold Level partner is the highest level of certification that 3Com offers, and it makes InPath part of a elite group. While 3Com has close to 40,000 NBX resellers nationally only 100 of them have achieved the 3Com NBX Gold Level status. InPath's NBX Gold Level certification reflects our enormous investment in NBX technical resources and our success in serving our customers. We have pre-installed, implemented, serviced, and have provided customer support for the 3Com NBX 25, 3Com NBX 100, 3Com Superstack 3 NBX, and the NBX V3000 IP phone systems to customers nationwide and even as far away as Europe and Asia!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Business Alternatives, Inc

US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Established February 2002 in New York City, Business Alternatives has been servicing varying types of businesses with document management solutions, data entry outsourcing and custom solutions that save time and money across the enterprise. Customer Service, Security and the relationship that we establish with our clients is of the utmost importance. We at Business Alternatives feel we work with your business not just for it and together we are striving to create a seamless feel to your data. Business Alternatives currently services companies that have thousands of employees across multiple worksites across the country as well as dozens of single person, home-based businesses.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inpath-devices.jpeg
InPath Devices
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Business Alternatives, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
InPath Devices
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Business Alternatives, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InPath Devices in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Alternatives, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — InPath Devices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InPath Devices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Business Alternatives, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Alternatives, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inpath-devices.jpeg
InPath Devices
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Business Alternatives, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Business Alternatives, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InPath Devices company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Business Alternatives, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to InPath Devices company.

In the current year, Business Alternatives, Inc company and InPath Devices company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc company nor InPath Devices company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc company nor InPath Devices company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc company nor InPath Devices company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither InPath Devices company nor Business Alternatives, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither InPath Devices company nor Business Alternatives, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Business Alternatives, Inc company employs more people globally than InPath Devices company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither InPath Devices nor Business Alternatives, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.