Comparison Overview

Global Crossing Airlines

VS

Turkish Airlines

Global Crossing Airlines

Miami, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

Global Crossing Airlines (OTCQB: JETMF | JET: Cboe) is a US 121 domestic flag and supplemental airline flying the Airbus A320 family aircraft. GlobalX flies as an ACMI and wet-lease charter airline serving the US, Caribbean and Latin American markets. For more information, please visit www.globalxair.com.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 342
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Turkish Airlines

-, Istanbul, TR, 34149
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Turkish Airlines has soared to new heights since its first flight in 1933, becoming the airline that connects more countries than any other. Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the world-class service, comfort, and innovative travel experience we offer, designed to elevate every journey. With a diverse team of professionals from around the world, we are proud to be a truly global company, bringing together different perspectives and expertise to deliver an unparalleled travel experience. Powered by an expansive and unrivaled network, we bridge continents and cultures, providing a seamless and premium journey that reflects our passion for aviation. Each flight carries the promise of comfort and the prestige of flying under the Turkish flag, with a dedication to delivering the best to our passengers. Our story is one of continuous growth, driven by a commitment to inspire new discoveries, and set the standard for global air travel.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 37,233
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-crossing-airlines.jpeg
Global Crossing Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Crossing Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Turkish Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Global Crossing Airlines has 751.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turkish Airlines in 2025.

Incident History — Global Crossing Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Crossing Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Turkish Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turkish Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-crossing-airlines.jpeg
Global Crossing Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Defacement
Motivation: Accusation of ignoring judicial orders related to deportation rulings
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Defacement and Data Theft
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Defacement, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Activism, Exposure of ICE Collaboration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/turkish-airlines.jpeg
Turkish Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Turkish Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Global Crossing Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Global Crossing Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Turkish Airlines company has not reported any.

In the current year, Global Crossing Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than Turkish Airlines company.

Neither Turkish Airlines company nor Global Crossing Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Global Crossing Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Turkish Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Global Crossing Airlines company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Turkish Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines company nor Turkish Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines company nor Turkish Airlines company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Turkish Airlines company employs more people globally than Global Crossing Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor Turkish Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X