Comparison Overview

Global Crossing Airlines

VS

AirAsia

Global Crossing Airlines

Miami, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

Global Crossing Airlines (OTCQB: JETMF | JET: Cboe) is a US 121 domestic flag and supplemental airline flying the Airbus A320 family aircraft. GlobalX flies as an ACMI and wet-lease charter airline serving the US, Caribbean and Latin American markets. For more information, please visit www.globalxair.com.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 342
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

AirAsia

AirAsia Berhad, Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, 64000, MY
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

It all starts here. 23 years ago, a dream took flight - shaping and forever changing the travel industry in Asia. The idea was simple: Make flying affordable for everyone. We made that dream happen. We started an airline in 2001. Today, we’ve evolved to become something much bigger. We’re now a world-class brand, a leading Asean airline, a digital travel and lifestyle platform; and we’re not stopping. If you’re passionate about connecting people and transforming lives, we want you onboard. When it comes to your career, your Allstar journey will be an adventure. Find your dream career destination with us.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,494
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-crossing-airlines.jpeg
Global Crossing Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airasia.jpeg
AirAsia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Crossing Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AirAsia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Global Crossing Airlines has 751.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AirAsia in 2025.

Incident History — Global Crossing Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Crossing Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AirAsia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AirAsia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-crossing-airlines.jpeg
Global Crossing Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Defacement
Motivation: Accusation of ignoring judicial orders related to deportation rulings
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Defacement and Data Theft
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Defacement, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Activism, Exposure of ICE Collaboration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airasia.jpeg
AirAsia
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AirAsia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Global Crossing Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Global Crossing Airlines company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to AirAsia company.

In the current year, Global Crossing Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than AirAsia company.

AirAsia company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Global Crossing Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Global Crossing Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AirAsia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Global Crossing Airlines company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while AirAsia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines company nor AirAsia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AirAsia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Global Crossing Airlines company.

AirAsia company employs more people globally than Global Crossing Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Crossing Airlines nor AirAsia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X