Comparison Overview

Giza

VS

Network Critical

Giza

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 800 and 849

Giza is a team of professionals, based in the UK and Denmark, all working to world standards of quality. We’re good at what we do, with the track record to prove it. Our customers are all around the globe. How we work... We love engaging with people of different talents who are deeply involved and strongly committed to new ideas, whatever their backgrounds. We also like to work to one very clear principle – combining world-class quality with solid reliability to bring IT costs down to a manageable level. We’ve plenty of other cost-savers to recommend too. Just contact us and we’ll get them working for you. 1 visible recommendation for this posit

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Network Critical

East Throp House, Caversham, Berkshire, RG4 5BY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Established in 1997 by Alastair Hartrup, Network Critical has grown to become the world market leading designer and manufacturer of network access solutions for the security and network management marketplace, offering customers flexible deployment options to maximise their solution investment. Our products are of the highest quality, designed by the best engineers in the business, and as a result Network Critical has a reputation for leading the industry with technological advances in the PBS (packet broker switch) & TAP (test access point) marketplace. Worldwide “firsts” include the 100% guaranteed 'zero packet loss'​ TAP and Drag-N-View™ technology. Specialising in the security marketplace, and with sales offices in the UK, US, EMEA & Asia, Network Critical supports its customer base with a world-wide network of reputable and responsible channel partners. These carefully selected “team members” provide turnkey solutions covering the complete range of Packet Brokers and Critical TAPs to end clients in the Telecom, Energy, Banking and Finance, Transport, Government, Pharmaceutical, Healthcare, Engineering and Media industries. At Network Critical, we try to ensure that every aspect of doing business with us is as seamless as possible. We offer our channel partners and their customers a range of pre- and post-sales services which enables quick, efficient and dependable product selection; this, in turn, allows for the timely deployment of the overall security or monitoring solution. Our ethos is to "keep it simple, get it right"​. We don't believe in trying to make our business more complicated than it needs to be. Our people, like our products, are straightforward, honest and reliable. They are driven by customer satisfaction and are proud of our standing in the market as the “channel-friendly company.”

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-critical.jpeg
Network Critical
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Giza
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Network Critical
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Giza in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Critical in 2025.

Incident History — Giza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Network Critical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Critical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-critical.jpeg
Network Critical
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Giza company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Network Critical company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Network Critical company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Giza company.

In the current year, Network Critical company and Giza company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Network Critical company nor Giza company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Network Critical company nor Giza company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Network Critical company nor Giza company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Giza company nor Network Critical company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Network Critical company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Giza company.

Giza company employs more people globally than Network Critical company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Giza nor Network Critical holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.