GitLab A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
GitLab
Company Information
Website:https://about.gitlab.com/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=linkedin&utm_campaign=profile
Employees number:3,422
Number of followers:1,162,783
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:gitlab.com
GitLab Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
GitLabIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
30/07/2026
30/07/2026
747/1000
Moderate
Ba
GitLab Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
GitLabIT Services and IT Consulting
Score locked

GitLabModerate
Current Score
747Ba (MODERATE)
01000
9 incidents
-7.75 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
748
JULY 2026
752
Vulnerability
29 Jul 2026 • GitLab
GitLab: GitLab Fixes 13 Security Flaws That Can Leak Data, Alter Pipelines, and Crash Servers
GitLab Patches 13 Critical Vulnerabilities in July 2026 Security Update
747
CRITICAL-5
GIT1785407607
GitLab Patches 13 Critical Vulnerabilities in July 2026 Security Update
GitLab released critical security updates on July 29, 2026, addressing 13 vulnerabilities in its Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) deployments. The patches versions 19.2.1, 19.1.3, and 19.0.5 resolve high-, medium-, and low-severity flaws that could expose sensitive data, manipulate CI/CD pipelines, and disrupt server availability.
### Key Vulnerabilities Fixed
Among the most severe issues:
- CVE-2026-6267 (CVSS 8.5): A high-severity flaw in GitLab Workhorse allowing authenticated Developer-level users to access sensitive internal data due to improper access controls.
- CVE-2026-12436: A mass-assignment vulnerability in the Pipeline Schedule API, enabling attackers to modify other users’ CI/CD configurations, potentially leading to unauthorized pipeline executions.
- CVE-2026-15975: A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in merge request discussions, exploitable by unauthenticated attackers to crash or degrade server performance.
Additional medium-severity flaws include:
- Race conditions in merge request approval rules, risking unauthorized code merges into protected branches.
- Improper authorization in project imports, pipeline test reports, and merge request metadata, exposing confidential data.
- Cross-site scripting (XSS) and prompt injection vulnerabilities in GitLab Duo AI-assisted tools, highlighting emerging risks in AI-driven development.
### Potential Attack Scenarios
A low-privilege developer could exploit the Pipeline Schedule API flaw to inject malicious scripts into CI/CD pipelines, leading to supply chain compromise, unauthorized deployments, or data exfiltration without detection.
### Patch Deployment & Impact
- GitLab.com and GitLab Dedicated users are already protected.
- Self-managed users must upgrade immediately, as patches include database migrations that may cause downtime for single-node deployments.
- Multi-node environments can apply updates with zero-downtime procedures.
GitLab will publicly disclose all vulnerabilities 90 days post-patch, following responsible disclosure practices. The company emphasized the urgency of updates to secure code repositories and development workflows.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JUNE 2026
750
MAY 2026
753
Vulnerability
21 May 2026 • GitLab
GitLab: Two Old Oj Flaws Chained to Trigger GitLab Remote Code Execution
Critical GitLab RCE Vulnerability Exploits Ruby JSON Parser Flaws
749
CRITICAL-4
GIT1785155190
Critical GitLab RCE Vulnerability Exploits Ruby JSON Parser Flaws
A newly disclosed vulnerability in GitLab allows remote code execution (RCE) by chaining two long-standing memory-safety flaws in the Oj JSON parsing library, a high-performance Ruby dependency. Discovered by Yuhang Wu of the Open Defense Initiative, the exploit targets default GitLab installations, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands, access repositories, steal secrets, and compromise internal services.
The attack leverages Jupyter Notebook (.ipynb) file processing in GitLab, which uses the ipynbdiff gem to parse notebooks with Oj before displaying differences. By submitting maliciously crafted notebooks in a single commit-diff request, an authenticated user with standard push and diff-view permissions could corrupt memory, bypass Address Space Layout Randomisation (ASLR), and gain code execution as the “git” system user.
The vulnerabilities an unchecked nesting-stack write and an unsafe 16-bit key-length narrowing issue had gone undetected for nearly five years. While individually limited, their combination allowed heap manipulation, callback pointer control, and arbitrary command execution. Unlike prior GitLab RCE exploits that relied on SSRF against Redis, this attack bypasses modern protections by targeting a memory-unsafe native dependency in Ruby.
Affected Versions & Fixes
The flaw impacts GitLab CE/EE versions 15.2.0–18.10.7, 18.11.0–18.11.4, and 19.0.0–19.0.1, with patches released in 18.10.8, 18.11.5, and 19.0.2. The Oj gem (versions 3.13.0–3.17.1) was fixed in 3.17.3. GitLab.com was patched pre-disclosure, while self-managed instances require immediate upgrades.
The vulnerabilities were reported on 21 May 2026, with Oj fixes merged on 27 May and released on 4 June. GitLab confirmed and patched the exploit chain by 10 June 2026. The same research also uncovered nine additional CVEs in Oj, including buffer overflows and use-after-free flaws, underscoring risks in memory-unsafe Ruby extensions.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
APRIL 2026
768
Cyber Attack
01 Apr 2026 • GitLab
GitLab, Proofpoint, Google, GitHub, Phantom and Firefox: North Korean Hackers Use Fake Coding Tasks to Steal Crypto
North Korean Threat Actor Targets Developers in Large-Scale Phishing Campaign
750
LOW-18
MOZPHAGITPROGOOGIT1780935989
North Korean Threat Actor Targets Developers in Large-Scale Phishing Campaign
A likely North Korean threat actor has conducted a sophisticated phishing campaign, targeting nearly 100 organizations primarily in the U.S. with fake job offers and code-review requests to steal cryptocurrency and credentials. The operation, tracked by Proofpoint as UNK_DeadDrop, sent over 250 malicious emails in April and May 2026, focusing on employees in technology, education, finance, and cryptocurrency firms.
### How the Attack Worked
The campaign used shifting pretexts including fake full-stack developer roles, AI payment agent projects, and ERC-4626 smart-contract testing to lure victims into cloning malicious GitHub or GitLab repositories. Once opened in VS Code or Cursor, a hidden tasks.json file executed automatically, exploiting a legitimate editor feature.
- VS Code displayed a trust prompt, but Cursor ran the payload silently without user interaction.
- The malware installed a fake Google-themed VS Code extension, ensuring persistence by relaunching on macOS and Linux whenever the editor reopened.
- Linux/macOS systems received a Go-based remote access trojan (RAT) from the open-source Overlord framework, while Windows ran JavaScript directly in the editor, leaving no disk footprint.
### Data Theft & Wallet Drainage
The malware targeted cryptocurrency wallets and browser credentials, including:
- Browser extensions: MetaMask, Phantom, Keplr
- Desktop wallets: Exodus, Electrum, Ledger Live
- Saved passwords & cookies from Chrome, Brave, Edge, and Firefox
To bypass security:
- macOS/Linux displayed a fake password prompt, using the input to escalate privileges and dump keychains.
- Windows bypassed Chrome’s app-bound encryption to extract data.
After exfiltration, the malware deleted itself to evade detection.
### Attribution & Distinct Tactics
While resembling Contagious Interview a long-running North Korean operation Proofpoint tracks UNK_DeadDrop separately due to its email-led delivery, large-scale repository creation, and self-contained payloads that persist even after infrastructure takedowns. Though attribution remains unconfirmed, the campaign aligns with North Korea’s history of targeting developers since 2022.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
MARCH 2026
767
FEBRUARY 2026
771
Vulnerability
11 Feb 2026 • GitLab
GitLab: GitLab Patches Multiple Vulnerabilities Enabling DoS and Cross-Site Scripting Attacks
GitLab Releases Critical Security Patches for High-Severity Vulnerabilities
773
CRITICAL-2
GIT1770804634
GitLab Releases Critical Security Patches for High-Severity Vulnerabilities
GitLab has issued urgent security updates for its Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE), addressing multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in versions 18.8.4, 18.7.4, and 18.6.6. The patches mitigate risks including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, cross-site scripting (XSS), and unauthorized data access, which could expose sensitive information like access tokens.
The most critical flaw, CVE-2025-7659 (CVSS 8.0), involves incomplete validation in GitLab’s Web IDE, allowing unauthenticated attackers to steal tokens and access private repositories. Other notable vulnerabilities include CVE-2025-8099 (CVSS 7.5), a DoS risk in GraphQL introspection, and CVE-2026-0958 (CVSS 7.5), which exploits weak JSON validation to exhaust server resources. XSS and injection flaws, such as CVE-2025-14560 (CVSS 7.3), could enable session hijacking or fake content delivery.
Additional risks include DoS in Markdown tools and dashboards, as well as server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities that could probe internal networks. GitLab.com users are already protected, but self-managed instances require immediate updates to prevent exploitation. The patches highlight the ongoing threat of automated attacks targeting unpatched systems. Full details are available in GitLab’s release notes.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2026
775
Vulnerability
03 Feb 2026 • GitLab
GitLab: CISA Warns of Actively Exploited GitLab SSRF Vulnerability in Community and Enterprise Editions
Actively Exploited SSRF Vulnerability in GitLab (CVE-2021-39935)
771
CRITICAL-4
GIT1770208485
CISA Warns of Actively Exploited SSRF Vulnerability in GitLab
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an alert regarding an actively exploited Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions, tracked as CVE-2021-39935. The flaw, added to CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog on February 3, 2026, allows unauthenticated attackers to force GitLab servers to make unauthorized requests via the CI Lint API, potentially exposing internal systems or enabling further exploitation.
The vulnerability stems from improper URL validation during CI/CD configuration checks, enabling attackers to scan internal networks, leak credentials, or exploit connected services. While GitLab patched the issue in 2021, recent reports indicate renewed exploitation of unpatched instances, particularly those exposed to the internet.
CISA has set a February 24, 2026 deadline for federal agencies to mitigate the flaw under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01. The agency highlights the risk of supply-chain attacks, as SSRF flaws in CI/CD pipelines can expose cloud metadata services, revealing sensitive tokens or configurations. Though no specific threat actor has been attributed, SSRF vulnerabilities have historically been used for crypto-mining, lateral movement, and initial access in broader compromises.
GitLab has released security updates for affected versions. Organizations are advised to upgrade immediately, restrict API exposure, monitor logs for suspicious activity, and implement network segmentation to limit potential damage. Given GitLab’s widespread use in DevOps workflows, unpatched instances remain a prime target for attackers.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2026
775
DECEMBER 2025
775
NOVEMBER 2025
774
OCTOBER 2025
774
SEPTEMBER 2025
774
JUNE 2025
777
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2025 • GitLab
GitLab
GitLab Critical Security Patches Addressing Multiple Vulnerabilities Including Prompt-Injection Flaw in GitLab Duo
772
CRITICAL-5
GIT5234552111325
GitLab disclosed nine vulnerabilities across its Community (CE) and Enterprise (EE) editions, with CVE-2025-6945 being the most critical—a prompt-injection flaw in GitLab Duo’s AI-powered review feature that allows authenticated attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data from confidential issues via hidden prompts in merge request comments. This exploit leverages AI’s lack of input validation, turning an AI assistant into a vector for data leakage. Additionally, CVE-2025-11224 (a stored XSS vulnerability in the Kubernetes proxy) enables authenticated users to execute malicious scripts, while CVE-2025-2615 and CVE-2025-7000 expose confidential data through GraphQL subscriptions and branch name leaks, respectively. The flaws span versions back to 15.10, creating a broad attack surface for organizations running unpatched instances. Though no evidence of active exploitation exists, the vulnerabilities risk unauthorized access to proprietary code, internal discussions, and project metadata, potentially aiding supply-chain attacks or competitive espionage. GitLab has released patches (versions 18.5.2, 18.4.4, 18.3.6) and urged immediate upgrades for self-managed deployments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
MARCH 2022
759
Vulnerability
01 Mar 2022 • GitLab
GitLab
Critical Vulnerability in GitLab Community
755
CRITICAL-4
GIT1372322
A critical vulnerability discovered in GitLab Community could enable an attacker to steal runner registration tokens.
The vulnerability announced in GitLab security advisory affects all versions.
If this vulnerability is exploited then an unauthorized user can steal runner registration tokens through an information disclosure vulnerability using quick actions commands.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2022
783
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2022 • GitLab
GitLab: North Korean fake IT worker tradecraft exposed
North Korean Threat Actors Exploit IT Recruitment to Deploy Malware and Infiltrate Organizations
758
CRITICAL-25
GIT1773311240
North Korean Threat Actors Exploit IT Recruitment to Deploy Malware and Infiltrate Organizations
GitLab’s recent research has uncovered a sophisticated campaign by North Korean threat actors who weaponize the tech recruitment process to target software developers particularly in the cryptocurrency and financial sectors. Posing as recruiters or hiring managers, these actors trick developers into executing malicious payloads under the guise of technical assessments, bypassing traditional security defenses by exploiting trusted hiring pipelines.
The operation, active since at least 2019 and intensifying in 2022, involves fake IT workers often operating from locations like Moscow and Beijing who infiltrate organizations through freelance platforms and smaller companies. One Beijing-based cell, comprising eight North Korean nationals, generated over $1.64 million between Q1 2022 and Q3 2025, with individual earnings exceeding $11,000 per member in Q3 2025. These groups maintain elaborate synthetic personas, sometimes controlling up to 21 unique identities, complete with stolen U.S. documents and fabricated professional histories.
Key Tactics and Evolution
- Malware Delivery: Threat actors abuse private code repositories (including GitLab and Visual Studio Code) to distribute obfuscated loaders for malware like BeaverTail and Ottercookie, often hosted externally.
- AI-Driven Tradecraft: North Korean groups increasingly rely on AI to refine malware obfuscation, automate synthetic identity creation, and scale deception operations. Tools like ClickFix and generative AI have lowered the barrier for large-scale fraud.
- Targeting Preferences: While U.S.-based developers and fintech firms are primary targets, the campaigns are opportunistic, spanning multiple industries. Smaller organizations with limited vetting processes are particularly vulnerable.
- Operational Security: Actors use consumer VPNs, VPS infrastructures, and laptop farms to mask their origins, though some access was traced to dedicated servers.
GitLab’s Response and Findings
GitLab disrupted the campaign by banning 131 North Korean-attributed accounts in 2025, many linked to the "Contagious Interview" scheme. Compromised repositories contained sensitive data, including passport scans, banking records, performance reviews, and financial spreadsheets revealing the groups’ internal hierarchies and revenue streams. Performance evaluations even assessed members’ contributions to household tasks (e.g., laundry, shared groceries) alongside technical and ideological adherence.
Broader Implications
The research highlights the parallel operations of multiple DPRK teams, which share tradecraft but operate with limited coordination. The shift toward AI-enhanced deception and malicious NPM dependencies signals a growing sophistication in social engineering and supply-chain attacks. While freelance platforms remain a common entry point, larger organizations are also at risk as these scams expand in scope.
GitLab’s report includes over 600 indicators of compromise to aid defenders in detecting and mitigating such threats. The findings underscore the persistent threat posed by state-aligned actors exploiting trust in the tech hiring ecosystem.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2021
782
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2021 • GitLab
GitLab and Federal Civilian Executive Branch: CISA Warns of Exploited GitLab Community and Enterprise SSRF Vulnerability
Critical GitLab SSRF Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation, CISA Warns
781
CRITICAL-1
GITGAL1770201332
Critical GitLab SSRF Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation, CISA Warns
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added CVE-2021-39935, a severe server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog after confirming active exploitation in the wild.
The flaw resides in GitLab’s CI Lint API, allowing unauthenticated attackers to manipulate the server into making unauthorized requests to internal systems. By exploiting this weakness, threat actors can bypass perimeter defenses, access restricted resources, and potentially move laterally within compromised networks. The vulnerability (tracked as CWE-918) poses risks including data exposure, supply chain compromise via CI/CD pipeline manipulation, and unauthorized access to cloud metadata or internal infrastructure.
Both GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions are affected, with CISA’s inclusion in the KEV catalog underscoring the urgency of remediation. While no direct links to ransomware campaigns have been confirmed, the flaw’s potential for initial access makes it a prime target for advanced persistent threat (APT) groups and initial access brokers.
Under Binding Operational Directive 22-01, Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies must patch or mitigate the vulnerability by February 24, 2026. Organizations unable to apply fixes are advised to discontinue use of affected GitLab instances until updates are available. GitLab has released patches, and administrators are urged to upgrade immediately, review CI Lint API configurations, and monitor logs for suspicious activity such as unusual API requests or unexpected internal connections originating from GitLab servers.
Cloud-hosted GitLab users should adhere to BOD 22-01 guidance for securing cloud services. The incident highlights the growing threat of SSRF attacks, which can evade traditional security measures by leveraging trusted servers as proxies for malicious activity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for GitLab ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on GitLab's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with GitLab ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view GitLab's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?