Comparison Overview

Garland Technology

VS

Frontier

Garland Technology

199 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York, 14202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.garlandtechnology.com

Garland Technology is an industry leader of IT and OT network solutions for enterprise, critical infrastructures, and government agencies worldwide. Since 2011, Garland Technology has been engineering and manufacturing simple, reliable, and affordable Network TAPs and Network Packet Brokers in Richardson, Texas. For help identifying the right IT / OT network visibility solutions for projects large and small, or to learn more about the inventor of the first bypass technology, please reach out anytime. Blog: https://www.garlandtechnology.com/blog Twitter: https://twitter.com/GarlandTech Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GarlandTechnologyLlc Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/garlandtechnologyllc

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Frontier

1275 Business Park Drive, Traverse City, Michigan, 49686, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frontierus.com

Frontier specializes in offering complete network connectivity solutions for deployments of all sizes. From small office to large enterprise, we provide resellers with continuous availability, undeniable security, and uniquely complete solutions. Frontier has experience solving for connectivity challenges in a wide range of industries. With our global presence, we can support partners in the United States, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom and South America.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garland-technology-llc.jpeg
Garland Technology
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-computer-corporation.jpeg
Frontier
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Garland Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Frontier
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Garland Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frontier in 2025.

Incident History — Garland Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garland Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Frontier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frontier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garland-technology-llc.jpeg
Garland Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-computer-corporation.jpeg
Frontier
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Garland Technology company and Frontier company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Frontier company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Garland Technology company.

In the current year, Frontier company and Garland Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Frontier company nor Garland Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Frontier company nor Garland Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Frontier company nor Garland Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Garland Technology company nor Frontier company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Garland Technology company nor Frontier company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Garland Technology company employs more people globally than Frontier company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Garland Technology nor Frontier holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References