Comparison Overview

Force10 Networks

VS

Cisco Crisis Response

Force10 Networks

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Force10 Networks develops high-performance data center solutions powered by the industry’s most innovative line of open, standards-based, networking hardware and software. The company’s Open Cloud Networking framework grants Web 2.0/portal operators, cloud and hosting providers, enterprise and special-purpose data center customers new levels of flexibility, performance, scale and automation—fundamentally changing the economics of data center networking. Force10 Networks operates globally, providing 24x7 service and support to its customer base in more than 60 countries worldwide. For more information, visit www.force10networks.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 266
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cisco Crisis Response

San Jose, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Cisco Systems emergency technology response team. We respond to disasters and other catastrophes when requested by Cisco customers. Our team deploys with satellite-based communications kits, radios and the Cisco Network Emergency Response Vehicles (NERV). We also assist first responders, governments, critical infrastructure and NGOs with various activities when we're not doing disaster-related work. Administrators of this page are employees of Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in any comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not those of Cisco.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/force10-networks.jpeg
Force10 Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Force10 Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cisco Crisis Response
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Force10 Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cisco Crisis Response in 2025.

Incident History — Force10 Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Force10 Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cisco Crisis Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco Crisis Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/force10-networks.jpeg
Force10 Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ciscocrisisresponse.jpeg
Cisco Crisis Response
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Force10 Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cisco Crisis Response company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cisco Crisis Response company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Force10 Networks company.

In the current year, Cisco Crisis Response company and Force10 Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cisco Crisis Response company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Force10 Networks company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Force10 Networks company nor Cisco Crisis Response company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Force10 Networks company employs more people globally than Cisco Crisis Response company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Cisco Crisis Response holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.