Comparison Overview

Finger Lakes Library System

VS

Lawrence Public Library

Finger Lakes Library System

1300 Dryden Road, Ithaca, New York 14850, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.flls.org

The Finger Lakes Library System is a cooperative library system, chartered in 1958 by New York State, to serve the public libraries in Cayuga, Cortland, Seneca, Tioga, and Tompkins Counties. Our member libraries, currently numbering 33, are independent and governed by local Boards of Trustees. One of twenty-three library systems in New York State, we operate under a state-approved plan of service. The System is governed by an eleven member Board of Trustees with two representatives from each of the five counties served, and one at-large member. Public Library Systems were established in Education Law in the late 1950s by the State Legislature and Governor for the purpose of helping local libraries better serve their communities through cooperation, sharing resources, and by offering cost-effective services. Governance and function are established in the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. Most of the 23 public library systems in New York State are primarily supported by State funding.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lawrence Public Library

707 Vermont Street, Lawrence, KS, 66044, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lplks.org

Lawrence Public Library (LPL for short) is a community hub that believes in the power of connecting with each other through shared knowledge and resources. Located in the heart of Downtown Lawrence, Kansas — and on the road with our bookmobile, Dottie — we're committed to providing a space where everyone can learn, connect, create, and grow through access to our vast collections, resources, services, programs, and knowledgeable staff. The library is supported by tax dollars, the LPL Friends & Foundation's record-breaking book sales and philanthropic efforts, and dedicated efforts of more than 300 volunteers.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fingerlakeslibrarysystem.jpeg
Finger Lakes Library System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawrence-public-library.jpeg
Lawrence Public Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Finger Lakes Library System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lawrence Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finger Lakes Library System in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lawrence Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Finger Lakes Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finger Lakes Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lawrence Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lawrence Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fingerlakeslibrarysystem.jpeg
Finger Lakes Library System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lawrence-public-library.jpeg
Lawrence Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Finger Lakes Library System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lawrence Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lawrence Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Finger Lakes Library System company.

In the current year, Lawrence Public Library company and Finger Lakes Library System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lawrence Public Library company nor Finger Lakes Library System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lawrence Public Library company nor Finger Lakes Library System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lawrence Public Library company nor Finger Lakes Library System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System company nor Lawrence Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System company nor Lawrence Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lawrence Public Library company employs more people globally than Finger Lakes Library System company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Finger Lakes Library System nor Lawrence Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References