Comparison Overview

Express Media Group

VS

Seattle's Child

Express Media Group

2128, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

EMG (Express Media Group, formerly Express Publications) is the largest, privately owned publisher of special-interest magazines in Australia. Our mission statement is: “To deliver more than our customers expect”. • For the past 20 years EMG has been dedicated to meeting the needs of enthusiasts with a passion for motoring, craft and outdoor leisure. • EMG publishes over 30 magazine titles in Australia which between them sell over 5 million copies each year. They include the top-selling titles in their categories, such as Australian 4WD Action, Caravan & Motorhome, Australian Patchwork & Quilting and Scrapbooking Memories. • This consumer power has now been extended to the online market and the EMG website network attracts over 420,000 unique visitors every month with more than 5 million page views.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 215
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seattle's Child

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Seattle's Child was the first local parenting publication in the country when it launched in 1979 and continues to be the industry leader. With our monthly magazine, special publications (Summer, Baby, Explore, School, Family Page), mobile responsive website and enewsletters, Seattle's Child is the guide to all topics relevant to parents and people who work with kids. We're interested in how parents make house a home, how families create community and what parents are talking about. We know there is no one way to be a good parent and seek to reflect real Puget Sound families and their broad range of parenting experiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/express-media-group.jpeg
Express Media Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle's-child.jpeg
Seattle's Child
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Express Media Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seattle's Child
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Express Media Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle's Child in 2025.

Incident History — Express Media Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Express Media Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seattle's Child (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle's Child cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/express-media-group.jpeg
Express Media Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle's-child.jpeg
Seattle's Child
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Express Media Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seattle's Child company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seattle's Child company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Express Media Group company.

In the current year, Seattle's Child company and Express Media Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Express Media Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Express Media Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seattle's Child company nor Express Media Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Express Media Group company nor Seattle's Child company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Express Media Group company nor Seattle's Child company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Express Media Group company employs more people globally than Seattle's Child company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Express Media Group nor Seattle's Child holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.