Comparison Overview

Ethic Inc

VS

Kind Design

Ethic Inc

1608 Cleveland Ave, East Point, GA, 30344, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Ethic is a creative branding agency that delivers experienced perspectives alongside clever, head-turning design. We know that communicating a brand’s unique capabilities to its audience requires a coordinated, day-to-day effort and a rock-solid plan of attack, and we’re there for all of it. Our job is to help great brands find their voice, and to stay in step long after our deliverables hit the market. Brand makers, brand keepers, storytellers, finders of lost treasure—we do it all. Purposefully located in downtown East Point, minutes from Atlanta and the world’s busiest airport, we offer all the skill and prowess of a big city agency with none of the corporate mire. We take pride in an honest, hard day’s work, tailor-crafted design that solves real-world problems, and the decency of forthright, two-way communication. We’re built on work ethic; it’s in our name, and it’s how we approach the day.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kind Design

5455 Spine Rd, Boulder, Colorado, 80301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Kind Design is a Colorado based clothing and design company. Inspired by nature, recreation, music, and much more, our goal is to encourage everyone to live their dream and be kind along the way. We focus on creating unique, American made products of the highest caliber. We also do custom design work ranging from: logo / branding, ski / snowboard topsheets, vehicle wraps, clothing, and much much more. Kind Design was almost completely wiped out by the 1000 year flood in Boulder, on September 12th 2013. Thanks to some great hats we designed, a few Facebook posts, and the support of people all over the country (& world), Kind Design not only survived the flood, but came out with one of the greatest success stories of all time. We are very fortunate to have the support of so many wonderful people and are forever grateful for their kindness. Customer service is our number one priority

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethic-inc-.jpeg
Ethic Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kind-design.jpeg
Kind Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ethic Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kind Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ethic Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kind Design in 2025.

Incident History — Ethic Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ethic Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kind Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kind Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ethic-inc-.jpeg
Ethic Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kind-design.jpeg
Kind Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kind Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ethic Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kind Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ethic Inc company.

In the current year, Kind Design company and Ethic Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kind Design company nor Ethic Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kind Design company nor Ethic Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kind Design company nor Ethic Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ethic Inc company nor Kind Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ethic Inc company nor Kind Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Ethic Inc company and Kind Design company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ethic Inc nor Kind Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X