Comparison Overview

Enterasys Networks

VS

Valet Computer

Enterasys Networks

6480 Via del Oro, San Jose, CA, 95119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.extremenetworks.com

Enterasys Networks was acquired by Extreme Networks on Nov 1, 2013. Extreme Networks, Inc. (EXTR) creates effortless networking experiences that enable all of us to advance. We push the boundaries of technology leveraging the powers of machine learning, artificial intelligence, analytics, and automation. Over 50,000 customers globally trust our end-to-end, cloud-driven networking solutions and rely on our top-rated services and support to accelerate their digital transformation efforts and deliver progress like never before. For more information, visit Extreme's website or follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook. https://www.extremenetworks.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 397
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Valet Computer

2718 Nye Drive, Minden, NV, 89423, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.valetcomputer.com

Valet Computer is dedicated to serving our local community's technology needs at an affordable rate in the Carson Valley area including Carson City, Gardnerville, Genoa and Minden. Our services include virus removal, tune-ups, networking services, IT outsourcing support, data recovery, service and repair. We are committed to bringing you the best possible value at every opportunity.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterasys-networks.jpeg
Enterasys Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valet-computer.jpeg
Valet Computer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enterasys Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valet Computer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enterasys Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valet Computer in 2025.

Incident History — Enterasys Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enterasys Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valet Computer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valet Computer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enterasys-networks.jpeg
Enterasys Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valet-computer.jpeg
Valet Computer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Valet Computer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enterasys Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Valet Computer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enterasys Networks company.

In the current year, Valet Computer company and Enterasys Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valet Computer company nor Enterasys Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valet Computer company nor Enterasys Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valet Computer company nor Enterasys Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enterasys Networks company nor Valet Computer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enterasys Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Valet Computer company.

Enterasys Networks company employs more people globally than Valet Computer company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enterasys Networks nor Valet Computer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References