Comparison Overview

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.

VS

Boston Review

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.

95 Regent Street, Cambridge, England, CB2 1AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

eLife is a non-profit organisation inspired by research funders and led by scientists. Our mission is to help scientists accelerate discovery by operating a platform for research communication that encourages and recognises the most responsible behaviours in science. eLife publishes important research in all areas of the life and biomedical sciences. The research is selected and evaluated by working scientists and is made freely available to all readers without delay. eLife also invests in innovation through open-source tool development to accelerate research communication and discovery. Our work is guided by the communities we serve. eLife was founded in 2011 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Max Planck Society and the Wellcome Trust​. These organisations continue to provide financial and strategic support, and were joined by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation for 2018.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boston Review

P.O. Box 390568, Cambridge, 02139, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Boston Review is a web and print magazine of ideas, politics, and culture. Independent and nonprofit, animated by hope and committed to equality, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. Our signature feature is the Forum, which subjects arguments on pressing issues of public concern to constructive scrutiny and debate. We take a special interest in matters of injustice—from war, human rights, and mass incarceration to poverty, inequality, and threats to democracy. Our 50-year archive features work by leading writers and public intellectuals, including Noam Chomsky, Susan Sontag, Robin D. G. Kelley, Vivian Gornick, Martha Nussbaum, Judith Butler, Pankaj Mishra, Arundhati Roy, John Rawls, bell hooks, Cornel West, Adrienne Rich, Sadiq Al-Azm, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders, among many others. To subscribe, visit https://www.bostonreview.net/memberships What People Are Saying: “An indispensable pillar of the public sphere.“ —Alondra Nelson “An essential, invaluable resource. Reminds us that thinking is always a collective endeavor and that ideas are expanded, challenged, and improved by being in dialogue.” —Astra Taylor “Plays a critically important role in getting ideas out in the world that can have a real impact in confronting the monumental challenges we face today.” —Noam Chomsky “Indispensable. . . Brims with that incredible rarity: the sort of writing that can convince people who are not already convinced.” —Becca Rothfeld “Some of the most penetrating and challenging cultural commentary, political discussion, and social analysis to be found anywhere in the United States. It is a must read.” —Politics and Prose Bookstore, Washington, D.C.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elife-sciences-publications-ltd.jpeg
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-review-magazine.jpeg
Boston Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Review in 2025.

Incident History — eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elife-sciences-publications-ltd.jpeg
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-review-magazine.jpeg
Boston Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boston Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company.

In the current year, Boston Review company and eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Review company nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Review company nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Review company nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company nor Boston Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company nor Boston Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company employs more people globally than Boston Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. nor Boston Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.