Comparison Overview

Cypress Networks

VS

Netgate

Cypress Networks

4125 Walker Ave, Ste. A, Greensboro, NC, US, 27407
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Call us today for a FREE NETWORK EVALUATION (866) 625-3502 Cypress Networks prides itself on being a premier provider of IT solutions for growing businesses. Our staff consists of knowledgeable Microsoft certified professionals with a variety of backgrounds and specialties. We have a range of offerings including: Managed Services, Network Consulting, HelpDesk Services, VoIP, Structured Cabling, and more.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Netgate

4616 W Howard Ln, Austin, Texas, 78728, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Secure networks start here.™ Netgate is focused on delivering secure high-performance network connectivity for everyone. Netgate believes in enhancing network connectivity that maintains both security and privacy. We also believe everyone should be able to afford it. Netgate directly supports and contributes to open source networking, secure IoT and firewall initiatives while also developing new high throughput secure networking technologies for the cloud and the IDIoT (Inherently Dangerous Internet of Things). We develop solutions that leverage our decades of experience in networking, security, open source, embedded, software and hardware engineering. We are breaking down the cost barriers to bring connectivity with security and privacy to everyone. Our security applications and solutions, such as open source pfSense®, TNSR® and Netgate systems provide real world protection for networks of all sizes. You can be confident your networks are secure. Netgate is: • The host of the pfSense® open source firewall project. Netgate contributes leadership, engineering, test, and infrastructure assets to the project. pfSense has more than 1 million active installs, supporting every size network from the home to small governments on all seven continents (yes, even Antarctica.) • The developer of TNSR. Advanced open source-based Firewall, Router, and VPN platform with breakthrough enterprise-class performance, management, and service expansion flexibility. • The source for deep domain expertise in Unix, networking, computer security, embedded software development and system development. Our “open source” roots reach back to the 1980s, and we are well known within the BSD networking and security communities. • The developer of a popular family of low-power, high-throughput networking platforms from micro-sized form factor to small rack-mount systems.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cypress-networks.jpeg
Cypress Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netgate.jpeg
Netgate
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cypress Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Netgate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cypress Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Netgate in 2025.

Incident History — Cypress Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cypress Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Netgate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Netgate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cypress-networks.jpeg
Cypress Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netgate.jpeg
Netgate
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cypress Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Netgate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Netgate company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cypress Networks company.

In the current year, Netgate company and Cypress Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Netgate company nor Cypress Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Netgate company nor Cypress Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Netgate company nor Cypress Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cypress Networks company nor Netgate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cypress Networks company nor Netgate company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Netgate company employs more people globally than Cypress Networks company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cypress Networks nor Netgate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.