Comparison Overview

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield

VS

Sieve Networks

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield

114 H Street, Bakersfield, CA, 93304, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

Cook’s Expetec is taking care of technology for businesses and professional services in Bakersfield, Kern County, Shafter, Taft, Delano, Wasco, San Joaquin Valley and the Golden Empire. Cook’s Expetec of Bakersfield are business owners just like you, but they’re technology professionals who are expertly trained to make your IT easier to manage and use. With solutions from the professionals at Expetec, you can increase productivity and profitability, whether you’re just starting out or simply need to update your current technology.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sieve Networks

10437 Innovation Dr., Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Generally, Sieve Networks is a comprehensive network infrastructure consulting firm where network security exists in harmony with business usability. Sieve leverages truly talented people to provide comprehensive secure network solutions for small and medium businesses. While small and medium business is the sweet spot for Sieve, we also provide network consulting for large businesses. Our approach is to plan for now and for later and offer solutions governed by client need. By definition a Sieve is a device used to separate desirable particles from undesirable ones. This is what we do with the data on your network, we help keep desirable data from undesirable data.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cook's-expetec-of-bakersfield.jpeg
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sieve-networks.jpeg
Sieve Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sieve Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sieve Networks in 2025.

Incident History — Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sieve Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sieve Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cook's-expetec-of-bakersfield.jpeg
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sieve-networks.jpeg
Sieve Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sieve Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sieve Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company.

In the current year, Sieve Networks company and Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sieve Networks company nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sieve Networks company nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sieve Networks company nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company nor Sieve Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company nor Sieve Networks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sieve Networks company employs more people globally than Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield nor Sieve Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.