Comparison Overview

GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization

VS

Cord Blood Association

GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization

Oakbrook, 60181, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Global technology Industry Association (GTIA) Information Sharing and Analysis Organization (ISAO) is a proactive threat intelligence and actionable analysis tool specifically tailored to meet the needs of technology vendors, MSPs, solution providers, integrators, distributors, business technology consultants, and their customers. We also provide members with a trusted community of peers where you can share cybersecurity information and best practices. Together, we’re making our industry, our businesses and our customers’ businesses more cyber resilient.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cord Blood Association

8735 W Higgins Road, None, Chicago, IL, US, 60631
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Cord Blood Association is an international nonprofit organization that promotes both public and family cord blood banking and accelerates the use of cord blood and birthing tissues to benefit patients and advance medicine. Our members include both public and family banks and individuals in and served by the cord blood community including cord blood bank personnel, research investigators, laboratory technicians, patients, donors, regulatory officials, vendors and health care providers such as transplant physicians, obstetricians, pediatricians, nurses and midwives.

NAICS: 81391
NAICS Definition: Business Associations
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cord-blood-association.jpeg
Cord Blood Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cord Blood Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization in 2025.

Incidents vs Industry Associations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cord Blood Association in 2025.

Incident History — GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cord Blood Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cord Blood Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comptiaisao.jpeg
GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cord-blood-association.jpeg
Cord Blood Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cord Blood Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cord Blood Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company.

In the current year, Cord Blood Association company and GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cord Blood Association company nor GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cord Blood Association company nor GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cord Blood Association company nor GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company nor Cord Blood Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cord Blood Association company.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GTIA ISAO (Information Sharing & Analysis Organization nor Cord Blood Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.