Comparison Overview

Coinmama

VS

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC

Coinmama

Ontario, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Coinmama believes that the future of money is open source, decentralized and borderless. We believe that economic freedom and financial services should be available to every human being. It's why our mission is to simplify the way the world does cryptocurrency, and why we work to make crypto easy, friendly, and safe for our growing community of 2 million users around the world. We're here to serve you in this financial revolution. For more information, visit our company site at www.coinmama.com

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC

707 2nd Ave S, Minneapolis, MN, US, 55402
Last Update: 2025-12-01

At Ameriprise Financial, we have been helping people feel more confident about their financial future for 130 years. With extensive investment advice, asset management and insurance capabilities and a nationwide network of approximately 10,000 financial advisors*, we have the strength and expertise to serve the full range of individual and institutional investors' financial needs.  Ameriprise has corporate locations throughout the U.S. and across the globe, and advisor offices in all 50 states.  Certain hyperlinks within Ameriprise Financial web sites or social media content may hyperlink to third-party content which we believe to be reliable however, we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. For this reason, we do not endorse any linked third-party content, advertising, advice, opinions, recommendations, or other information; it's merely intended to be provided as a general source of information and is not a solicitation to buy or sell any securities, accounts, or strategies. In addition, any linked third-party content should not be used as the sole basis for any investment decisions, nor should it be construed as a recommendation or advice designed to meet the particular needs of an individual investor. Please seek the advice of a financial advisor regarding your particular financial situation.   Investment products are not insured by the FDIC, NCUA or any federal agency, are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed by any financial institution, and involve investment risks including possible loss of principal and fluctuation in value. Investment advisory products and services are made available through Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC, a registered investment adviser.    Securities offered by Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC. Member FINRA and SIPC. For additional important disclosures on engagement rules, linking to third party content or other risks, please visit: www.ameriprise.com/social  *Ameriprise Financial Q1 2024 Earnings Release.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17,591
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coinmama.jpeg
Coinmama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameriprise-financial-services-llc.jpeg
Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coinmama
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coinmama in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Coinmama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coinmama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coinmama.jpeg
Coinmama
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Multi-platform Hack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameriprise-financial-services-llc.jpeg
Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Coinmama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Coinmama company.

In the current year, Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company has reported more cyber incidents than Coinmama company.

Neither Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company nor Coinmama company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Coinmama company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company nor Coinmama company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coinmama company nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coinmama company nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC company employs more people globally than Coinmama company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coinmama nor Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: hide VRAM sysfs attributes on GPUs without VRAM Otherwise accessing them can cause a crash.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference in VRAM logic for APU devices Previously, APU platforms (and other scenarios with uninitialized VRAM managers) triggered a NULL pointer dereference in `ttm_resource_manager_usage()`. The root cause is not that the `struct ttm_resource_manager *man` pointer itself is NULL, but that `man->bdev` (the backing device pointer within the manager) remains uninitialized (NULL) on APUs—since APUs lack dedicated VRAM and do not fully set up VRAM manager structures. When `ttm_resource_manager_usage()` attempts to acquire `man->bdev->lru_lock`, it dereferences the NULL `man->bdev`, leading to a kernel OOPS. 1. **amdgpu_cs.c**: Extend the existing bandwidth control check in `amdgpu_cs_get_threshold_for_moves()` to include a check for `ttm_resource_manager_used()`. If the manager is not used (uninitialized `bdev`), return 0 for migration thresholds immediately—skipping VRAM-specific logic that would trigger the NULL dereference. 2. **amdgpu_kms.c**: Update the `AMDGPU_INFO_VRAM_USAGE` ioctl and memory info reporting to use a conditional: if the manager is used, return the real VRAM usage; otherwise, return 0. This avoids accessing `man->bdev` when it is NULL. 3. **amdgpu_virt.c**: Modify the vf2pf (virtual function to physical function) data write path. Use `ttm_resource_manager_used()` to check validity: if the manager is usable, calculate `fb_usage` from VRAM usage; otherwise, set `fb_usage` to 0 (APUs have no discrete framebuffer to report). This approach is more robust than APU-specific checks because it: - Works for all scenarios where the VRAM manager is uninitialized (not just APUs), - Aligns with TTM's design by using its native helper function, - Preserves correct behavior for discrete GPUs (which have fully initialized `man->bdev` and pass the `ttm_resource_manager_used()` check). v4: use ttm_resource_manager_used(&adev->mman.vram_mgr.manager) instead of checking the adev->gmc.is_app_apu flag (Christian)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size We found an infinite loop bug in the exFAT file system that can lead to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition. When a dentry in an exFAT filesystem is malformed, the following system calls — SYS_openat, SYS_ftruncate, and SYS_pwrite64 — can cause the kernel to hang. Root cause analysis shows that the size validation code in exfat_find() does not check whether dentry.stream.valid_size is negative. As a result, the system calls mentioned above can succeed and eventually trigger the DoS issue. This patch adds a check for negative dentry.stream.valid_size to prevent this vulnerability.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible memory leak in smb2_read() Memory leak occurs when ksmbd_vfs_read() fails. Fix this by adding the missing kvfree().

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible refcount leak in smb2_sess_setup() Reference count of ksmbd_session will leak when session need reconnect. Fix this by adding the missing ksmbd_user_session_put().