Comparison Overview

City of Brantford

VS

USDA

City of Brantford

Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.Brantford.ca

The City of Brantford is made up of a community of dedicated staff who work together to deliver hundreds of programs and services each day with the ultimate goal of enhancing the quality of life for our residents. Guided by the policies and priorities of Council, the City's Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) leads and brings together the efforts of all Commissions and departments, ensuring that the City's programs and services meet the demands and expectations of the community. Our determination to attract and retain the best and brightest talent is reflected in our investment in the people who work here. Our employees take pride in helping to build a better city for all while doing work that matters.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 788
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

USDA

1400 Independence Ave, Washington, 20250, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usda.gov

The United States Department of Agriculture is the United States federal executive department responsible for developing and executing U.S. federal government policy on farming, agriculture, and food. It aims to meet the needs of farmers and ranchers, promote agricultural trade and production, work to assure food safety, protect natural resources, foster rural communities and end hunger in the United States and abroad.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 23,435
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-brantford.jpeg
City of Brantford
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usda.jpeg
USDA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Brantford
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
USDA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Brantford in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USDA in 2025.

Incident History — City of Brantford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Brantford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — USDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-brantford.jpeg
City of Brantford
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Incorrect access permissions and configuration settings
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usda.jpeg
USDA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

USDA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Brantford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Brantford company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas USDA company has not reported any.

In the current year, USDA company and City of Brantford company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither USDA company nor City of Brantford company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

City of Brantford company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other USDA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither USDA company nor City of Brantford company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Brantford company nor USDA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

USDA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Brantford company.

USDA company employs more people globally than City of Brantford company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor USDA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References