Comparison Overview

City of Brantford

VS

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

City of Brantford

Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.Brantford.ca

The City of Brantford is made up of a community of dedicated staff who work together to deliver hundreds of programs and services each day with the ultimate goal of enhancing the quality of life for our residents. Guided by the policies and priorities of Council, the City's Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) leads and brings together the efforts of all Commissions and departments, ensuring that the City's programs and services meet the demands and expectations of the community. Our determination to attract and retain the best and brightest talent is reflected in our investment in the people who work here. Our employees take pride in helping to build a better city for all while doing work that matters.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 788
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

601 12th Street South, None, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22202
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tsa.gov

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a component agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), committed to securing the nation’s transportation systems to ensure safe and efficient travel for all. Our mission is to protect the American people by preventing threats and disruptions in the transportation sector, while enhancing the overall passenger experience. 🔹 Mission: Safeguard transportation systems and prevent security threats 🔹 Vision: Achieve a secure and resilient transportation network 🔹 Values: Integrity, Excellence, Accountability, and Innovation More than 60,000 people around the world make up #TeamTSA and ensure the safety of millions of people each day as they travel by plane, train, automobile or ferry. From the officers you see on the frontlines to our cybersecurity and mission support teams, we’re working hard to combat evolving threats and keep you safe. Join us in our commitment to a more secure travel experience. For more information, visit tsa.gov.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,759
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-brantford.jpeg
City of Brantford
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Brantford
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Brantford in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2025.

Incident History — City of Brantford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Brantford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-brantford.jpeg
City of Brantford
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Incorrect access permissions and configuration settings
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tsa.jpeg
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., unauthorized loans, employment fraud, government benefits fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Brantford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to City of Brantford company.

In the current year, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported more cyber incidents than City of Brantford company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while City of Brantford company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company and City of Brantford company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while City of Brantford company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while City of Brantford company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Brantford company.

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) company employs more people globally than City of Brantford company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Brantford nor Transportation Security Administration (TSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References