Comparison Overview

City of Bend

VS

Vlaamse overheid

City of Bend

710 NW Wall St, Bend, US, OR
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

Official LinkedIn for the City of Bend, Oregon. Our city features breathtaking scenery, year-round outdoor activities and a population of nearly 103,000. To view and apply for current job opportunities, please visit: governmentjobs.com/careers/bend Watch our latest updates: youtube.com/@CityofBendOregon Follow us on Social Media: instagram.com/cityofbendoregon/ facebook.com/CityofBendOregon/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 418
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Vlaamse overheid

Havenlaan 88 Brussels, Brussels Region, BE
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Bij de Vlaamse overheid geef je elke dag opnieuw het beste van jezelf, in een job die een verschil maakt in de maatschappij. Pas afgestudeerd of al een aantal jaren professionele ervaring achter de rug? Op zoek naar een job als arbeider, bediende, leidinggevende, administratief medewerker, ingenieur of ICT-expert? Bij de Vlaamse overheid - de meest aantrekkelijke werkgever in de publieke sector volgens Randstad (2019) - vind je stuk voor stuk uitdagende functies in uiteenlopende vakgebieden, op verschillende locaties in Vlaanderen. Je talent en inzet vinden we veel belangrijker dan je geslacht, gender, afkomst, leeftijd, geaardheid, handicap of chronische ziekte. Stel je vandaag nog kandidaat en bouw mee aan het divers Vlaanderen van morgen. Meer weten over werken voor Vlaanderen en onze openstaande vacatures? www.werkenvoorvlaanderen.be Je kan er ook inschrijven op onze wekelijkse vacaturenieuwsbrief!

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-bend.jpeg
City of Bend
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vlaamse-overheid.jpeg
Vlaamse overheid
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Bend
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vlaamse overheid
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Bend in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vlaamse overheid in 2025.

Incident History — City of Bend (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Bend cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vlaamse overheid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vlaamse overheid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-bend.jpeg
City of Bend
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vlaamse-overheid.jpeg
Vlaamse overheid
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vlaamse overheid company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Bend company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Bend company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Vlaamse overheid company has not reported any.

In the current year, Vlaamse overheid company and City of Bend company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor City of Bend company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor City of Bend company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vlaamse overheid company nor City of Bend company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Bend company nor Vlaamse overheid company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither City of Bend company nor Vlaamse overheid company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vlaamse overheid company employs more people globally than City of Bend company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Bend nor Vlaamse overheid holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.