Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden

VS

South Australian Museum

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden

3400 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Adventure. Conservation. Education. Community. The mission and vision of the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden is dedicated to creating adventure, conveying knowledge, conserving nature, and serving the community. With the addition of our fourth pillar to our Mission Statement, Serving Community, we recognize the responsibility to partner with diverse and economically challenged communities in our daily work. The world famous Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden was rated the #1 attraction locally and one of the top zoos in the nation by Zagat Survey. We were recognized by Parents Magazine as #7 on the “Top 10 Best Zoos for Kids.” We have also been recognized by Child Magazine as one of "The 10 Best Zoos for Kids." Over one million people visit our award-winning exhibits, and more than 500 animal and 3000 plant species annually. We are an accredited member of the Association of Zoos & Aquariums (AZA) and the American Public Gardens Association (APGA), internationally known for our success in the protection and propagation of endangered animals and plants, and engage in research and conservation projects worldwide. Available Job Opportunities: http://cincinnatizoo.org/about-us/job-opportunities/

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

South Australian Museum

South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The South Australian Museum is recognised as a global leader in Australian Aboriginal heritage and scientific research, based on its research and premier collections. The Museum is also one of the most highly visited cultural institutions in the country. The South Australian Museum is a division of Arts SA within the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC). The role of the museum, as prescribed under the South Australian Museum Act, 1976-1985 is: to increase knowledge and understanding of our natural and cultural heritage: to serve the community by acquiring, preserving, interpreting and presenting to the public, material evidence concerning people and nature; and to provide opportunities for study, education and enjoyment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-zoo-&-botanical-garden.jpeg
Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Australian Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Australian Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Australian Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Australian Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-zoo-&-botanical-garden.jpeg
Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-australian-museum.jpeg
South Australian Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to South Australian Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Australian Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company.

In the current year, South Australian Museum company and Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Australian Museum company nor Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company nor South Australian Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company nor South Australian Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden company employs more people globally than South Australian Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden nor South Australian Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X